Cited by 12Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

Dynamic properties of cyclic cosmologies

Open access
Pavlović, Petar, Sossich, Marko·2021·Physical Review D

Abstract

Our first goal in this work is to study general and model-independent properties of cyclic cosmologies. The large number of studies of bouncing cosmologies and different cyclic scenarios published recently call for a proper understanding of the universal properties of cyclic models. We thus first review and further elaborate the common physical and geometrical properties of various classes of cyclic models and then discuss how the cyclic Universe can be treated as a dynamic system. We then discuss how two theorems from dynamic systems analysis can be used to ensure the existence of cyclic cosmological solutions under certain conditions on the field equations. After this we proceed toward our second goal which is the application of the obtained results to different frameworks of modified gravity theories: $f(R)$ gravity, dynamic dark energy, and $f(T)$ gravity. We discuss the general requirements for the existence of cyclic solutions in these theories and also obtain various examples of cyclic cosmologies, while discussing their basic properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.103.023529

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simple modified gravity theories such as f(R) and f(T) gravity have a mathematical structure rich enough to support cosmologies of the form (22) and similar, although the appropriate modification function may not be expressible analytically.

    “Even the most simple modified gravity theories, such as f (R) and f (T ) gravity have the mathematical structure which is rich enough to support such type of solutions, although the appropriate modification function may not be expressible in analytical form (compare the discussion in [1]).”

    From Geodesically complete cyclic cosmologies and entropy (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavlović, P., & Sossich, M.
Affiliations
University of Zagreb (HR)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2021-01-22
Volume
103
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W3083911462
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
cyclic cosmology, bounce cosmology, dynamical systems analysis, existence theorems, f(R) gravity, dynamical dark energy, f(T) gravity, modified gravity, cosmological dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review