Cited by 26Pulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Spectral instability of black holes: Relating the frequency domain to the time domain

Open access

Abstract

Recent work has shown that the quasinormal mode spectrum of black holes is unstable under small perturbations (of order $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$) of the radial potential, while the early time-domain ringdown waveform is only marginally affected. In this paper we provide further insight into the apparent tension between the frequency-domain and the time-domain descriptions by analyzing the scattering properties of the problem. In the frequency domain, we study analytically the solutions corresponding to the perturbed potential. We show that there are two qualitatively different classes of instabilities, and that both Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes are affected by what we call a ``type II'' instability, i.e., an exponential migration of the mode frequencies away from their unperturbed value as the perturbing ``bump'' moves away from the peak of the unperturbed potential. In the time domain, we elucidate the effect of the spectral instability in terms of the causal structure of the Green's function. By using an equivalent scattering problem, we confirm analytically (and show numerically) that the deviation from the unperturbed waveform in the early ringdown stage is proportional to $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ when $\ensuremath{\epsilon}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.110.084018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 26

Authors
Yang, Y., Mai, Z.-F., Yang, R.-Q., Shao, L., & Berti, E.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Guangxi University (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2024-10-09
Volume
110
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W4403247199
Cited by
26
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11991053, 12247128, 12375051)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (1242018)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Peking University
  • National Science Foundation (AST-2307146, PHY-2207502, PHY-090003, PHY-20043, OAC-1920103)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (20-LPS20-0011, 21-ATP21-0010)
  • John Templeton Foundation (62840)
  • Simons Foundation
  • Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (PGR01167)
  • National SKA Program of China (2020SKA0120300)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
black hole quasinormal modes, spectral instability, Schwarzschild black hole, rotating black holes, scattering problems, gravitational waveforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review