The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole
Abstract
Hawking has predicted that a black hole will emit particles as if it had a temperature proportional to its surface gravity. This paper combines Hawking's quantum formalism with the black-hole perturbation methods of Teukolsky and Press to calculate the emission rate for the known massless particles. Numerical results indicate that a hole of mass $M\ensuremath{\gg}{10}^{17}$ g should emit a total power output of $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}\ensuremath{\hbar}{c}^{6}{G}^{\ensuremath{-}2}{M}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$, of which 81% is in neutrinos, 17% is in photons, and 2% is in gravitons. These rates plus an estimate for the emission rates of massive particles from smaller holes allow one to infer that a primordial black hole will have decayed away within the present age of the universe if and only if its initial mass was $M<(5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{14}$ g.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The total decay rate for a subset of the standard model was evaluated by Page, [55].”
From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“If we set Γ H = Ṁ /M , then”
From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“The black hole emits Hawking radiation at a rate depending on fundamental particle masses and spins.”
From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“If we set Γ H = Ṁ /M , then Γ H ≈ 3.6 × 10 -4 (G 2 M 3 C ) -1 (6.3)”
From Black holes as bubble nucleation sites (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“We may use the Hawking evaporation rate for a subset of the standard model evaluated by Page [43].Setting Γ H = Ṁ /M , we have Γ H ≈ 3.6 × 10 -4 (G 2 M 3 + ) -1 .”
From The fate of the Higgs vacuum (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cites
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
HAWKING, S. W. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/248030a0 · Cited by 5,669
Black Holes in the Early Universe
Carr, B. J., & Hawking, S. W. (1974) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/168.2.399 · Cited by 1,827
Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb
PRESS, W. H., & TEUKOLSKY, S. A. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238211a0 · Cited by 729
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- S. W. Hawking, 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 152, 75, 10.1093/mnras/152.1.75 · DOI · Paper page
- B. J. Carr, 1975, Astrophys. J., 201, 1, 10.1086/153853 · DOI · Paper page
- C. W. Allen, 1973, Astrophysical Quantities
- W. T. Zaumen, 1974, Nature, 247, 530, 10.1038/247530a0 · DOI
- G. W. Gibbons, 1975, Commun. Math. Phys., 44, 245, 10.1007/BF01609829 · DOI · Paper page
- S. A. Teukolsky, 1974, Astrophys. J., 193, 443, 10.1086/153180 · DOI
- B. Carter, 1973, Black Holes
- J. D. Bekenstein, 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 7, 2333, 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333 · DOI · Paper page
- S. A. Teukolsky, 1973, Astrophys. J., 185, 635, 10.1086/152444 · DOI
- A. A. Starobinsky, 1973, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 65, 3
- J. M. Blatt, 1952, Theoretical Nuclear Physics
- J. R. Gott, 1974, Astrophys. J., 194, 543, 10.1086/153273 · DOI
- S. A. Teukolsky, 1972, Phys. Rev. Lett., 29, 1114, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.1114 · DOI
- P. M. Morse, 1953, Methods of Theoretical Physics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes
Carr, B. J., Kohri, K., Sendouda, Y., & Yokoyama, J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.104019 · Cited by 1,166
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Lloyd, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023282 · Cited by 1,120
Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox
Penington, G. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)002 · Cited by 968
Trace anomalies and the Hawking effect
Christensen, S. M., & Fulling, S. A. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2088 · Cited by 701
Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information
Harlow, D. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015002 · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Page, D. N.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1976-01-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198-206
- ISSN
- 0556-2821
- Cited by
- 1,133
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review