Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 921

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Progress toward a theory of supergravity

Freedman, Daniel Z., van Nieuwenhuizen, P., Ferrara, S.·1976·Physical Review D

Abstract

As a new approach to supergravity, an action containing only vierbein and Rarita-Schwinger fields (${V}_{a\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\psi}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$) is presented together with supersymmetry transformations for these fields. The action is explicitly shown to be invariant except for a ${\ensuremath{\psi}}^{5}$ term in its variation. This term may also vanish, depending on a complicated calculation. (Added note: This term has now been shown to vanish by a computer calculation, so that the action presented here does possess full local supersymmetry.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.13.3214

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 921

Metadata

Authors
Freedman, D. Z., van Nieuwenhuizen, P., & Ferrara, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1976-06-15
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
3214-3218
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136760489
Cited by
921
References
0
FWCI
32.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress toward a theory of supergravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.13.3214
The paper
Freedman, D. Z., van Nieuwenhuizen, P., & Ferrara, S. (1976). Progress toward a theory of supergravity. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.13.3214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.