Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Particle emission rates from a black hole. III. Charged leptons from a nonrotating hole

Page, Don N.·1977·Physical Review D

Abstract

The Hawking emission rates from a nonrotating black hole of small charge are calculated for electrons and muons and their antiparticles. During the stochastic emission of these charged leptons, the charge of the hole fluctuates. Assuming that the only type of charged particle emitted significantly by a hole of mass $M$ is one of these spin-1/2 species with mass $\ensuremath{\mu}$ and charge $e$, the probability distribution for the charge of the hole is computed for $0 \ensuremath{\le} \frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c} \ensuremath{\le} 0.4$. The rms value varies from $6.14e$ for $\frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c} = 0$ to $2.76e$ for $\frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c}=0.4$ and is predicted to be $2.34e$ for $\frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c}>>1$. The electrostatic attraction between the emitted particle and its antiparticle, along with the charge fluctuations, causes the average emission rate and power to be lower than for otherwise-similar uncharged particles. This effect of the charge is calculated (ignoring radiative and self-energy corrections, which are of the same order in $e$) to be a few percent, depending upon $\frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c}$. The particle rest mass $\ensuremath{\mu}$ also impedes the emission, but by factors which can become much greater for a large enough hole: The average power is reduced to 50% of its value for massless spin-1/2 particles at $\frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c} = 0.160$ ($M = 8.33\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{16}$ g for electrons, 4.03 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{14}$ g for muons) and to 10% at $\frac{\mathrm{GM}\ensuremath{\mu}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c} = 0.271$ ($M = 1.41\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{17}$ g for electrons, 6.82 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{14}$ g for muons). It is estimated that muons and heavier particles would contribute about 14% of the power of a nonrotating black hole of $M = 5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{14}$ g, helping it to decay away in nearly 16 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{9}$ yr, roughly the present age of the universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.16.2402

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Page, D. N.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1977-10-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
2402-2411
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145326299
Cited by
295
References
2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.