The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields
Abstract
We study the phase diagram of lattice gauge theories coupled to fixed-length scalar (Higgs) fields. We consider several gauge groups: ${Z}_{2}$, U(1), and $\mathrm{SU}(N)$. We find that when the Higgs fields transform like the fundamental representation of the gauge group the Higgs and confining phases are smoothly connected, i.e., they are not separated by a phase boundary. When the Higgs fields transform like some representation other than the fundamental, a phase boundary may exist. This is the case for $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ with all the Higgs fields in the adjoint representation and for U(1) with all the Higgs fields in the charge-$N(N>1)$ representation. We present an argument due to Wegner that indicates the stability of the pure gauge transition. Another phase, free charge or Coulomb, is generally present. In this regime, the spectrum of the theory contains massless gauge bosons (for continuous groups) and finite-energy states that represent free charges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation
Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M., & Das Sarma, S. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083 · Cited by 6,861
Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator
Semeghini, G., Levine, H., Keesling, A., Ebadi, S., Wang, T. T., Bluvstein, D., Verresen, R., Pichler, H., Kalinowski, M., Samajdar, R., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abi8794 · Cited by 781
Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction
Sachdev, S. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae110 · Cited by 227
Entanglement renormalization and gauge symmetry
Tagliacozzo, L., & Vidal, G. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.115127 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Fradkin, E., & Shenker, S. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1979-06-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3682-3697
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136565179
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.