The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiative corrections in theSU(2)L×U(1)theory: A simple renormalization framework
Abstract
A simple renormalization framework to carry out practical calculations in the $\mathrm{SU}{(2)}_{L}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)$ theory is discussed. The basic counterterms associated with the mass matrix of the gauge bosons and their interactions with quarks and leptons are generated and determined in a straightforward manner. They can then be applied, in a systematic fashion, to study the radiative corrections to the various processes of interest: $\ensuremath{\mu}$ decay, $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay, $\ensuremath{\nu}$-induced reactions, and other leptonic and semileptonic processes. The role played by ${cos\ensuremath{\theta}}_{W}$ is discussed in some detail. Using the results and methods of the current-algebra formulation of radiative corrections, an effective Lagrangian is derived for $\ensuremath{\mu}$ decay in which the contributions of the heavy particles and some of the photonic corrections are reduced to a renormalization factor of the zeroth-order amplitude. This analysis determines the connection between the renormalized constants of the present framework and ${G}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$. The corrections to the relation ${m}_{W}=\frac{{(\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\alpha}}{\sqrt{2}{G}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}})}^{\frac{1}{2}}}{{sin\ensuremath{\theta}}_{W}}$ are discussed. This leads to some relevant observations concerning certain model-dependent hadronic contributions to these corrections and their cancellation in the comparison between charged-current transitions and neutral-current processes occurring at large momentum transfers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections
Peskin, M. E., & Takeuchi, T. (1992) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.381 · Cited by 2,070
Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance
(2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.006 · Cited by 1,525
Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson
Buttazzo, D., Degrassi, G., Giardino, P. P., Giudice, G. F., Sala, F., Salvio, A., & Strumia, A. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2013)089 · Cited by 1,095
The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking
Djouadi, A. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.10.004 · Cited by 987
Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model
Kajantie, K., Laine, M., Rummukainen, K., & Shaposhnikov, M. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00549-8 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Sirlin, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1980-08-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 971-981
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160230876
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiative corrections in theSU(2)L×U(1)theory: A simple renormalization framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.22.971
- The paper
- Sirlin, A. (1980). Radiative corrections in theSU(2)L×U(1)theory: A simple renormalization framework. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.22.971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.