Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems
Abstract
We present evidence for the existence of a universal upper bound of magnitude $\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}R}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c}$ to the entropy-to-energy ratio $\frac{S}{E}$ of an arbitrary system of effective radius $R$. For systems with negligible self-gravity, the bound follows from application of the second law of thermodynamics to a gedanken experiment involving a black hole. Direct statistical arguments are also discussed. A microcanonical approach of Gibbons illustrates for simple systems (gravitating and not) the reason behind the bound, and the connection of $R$ with the longest dimension of the system. A more general approach establishes the bound for a relativistic field system contained in a cavity of arbitrary shape, or in a closed universe. Black holes also comply with the bound; in fact they actually attain it. Thus, as long suspected, black holes have the maximum entropy for given mass and size which is allowed by quantum theory and general relativity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The speed with which a physical device can process information is limited by its energy.
“In particular, the speed with which a physical device can process information is limited by its energy 11 -26 and the amount of information that it can process is limited by the number of degrees of freedom it possesses 5 -40 .”
From Ultimate physical limits to computation (2000) · cites this paper as [20]
The laws of quantum mechanics determine the maximum rate at which a system with spread in energy ΔE can move from one distinguishable state to another.
“The problem of how much energy is required for information processing was first investigated in the context of communications theory by Levitin 11 -16 , Bremermann 17 -19 , Beckenstein 20 -22 and others, who showed that the laws of quantum mechanics determine the maximum rate at which a system with spread in energy ∆ E can move from one distinguishable state to another.”
From Ultimate physical limits to computation (2000) · cites this paper as [20]
As ordinary matter obeys the Bekenstein bound, k_B RE/ħcS > 1/2π, as one compresses the computer t_com/t_flip ≈ k_B RE/ħcS will remain greater than one, so the operation will still be somewhat parallel.
“As ordinary matter obeys the Beckenstein bound 20 -22 , k B RE/ ¯ hcS > 1 / 2 π , however, as one compresses the computer t com /tfl ip ≈ k B RE/ ¯ hcS will remain greater than one: i.e., the operation will still be somewhat parallel.”
From Ultimate physical limits to computation (2000) · cites this paper as [20]
The serial nature of computation at the black-hole limit can be deduced from the fact that black holes attain the Bekenstein bound, k_B RE/ħcS = 1/2π.
“As noted above, the serial nature of computation at the black-hole limit can be deduced from the fact that black holes attain the Beckenstein bound 20 -22 , k B RE/ ¯ hcS = 1 / 2 π .”
From Ultimate physical limits to computation (2000) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597 · see citing works
Fredkin, E., & Toffoli, T. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857727 · Cited by 1,896 · see citing works
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Lloyd, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023282 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
A covariant entropy conjecture
Bousso, R. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Computational Capacity of the Universe
Lloyd, S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.237901 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information
Harlow, D. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015002 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in General Relativity
Szabados, L. B. (2009) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2009-4 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Energy cost of information transfer
Bekenstein, J. D. (1981) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.46.623 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationCuriel, E. (2017) · Einstein Studies · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3210-8_3 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
A measure of de Sitter entropy and eternal inflation
Arkani-Hamed, N., Dubovsky, S., Nicolis, A., Trincherini, E., & Villadoro, G. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/055 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Entropy content and information flow in systems with limited energy
Bekenstein, J. D. (1984) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.1669 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationMinimum energy requirements of information transfer and computing
Bremermann, H. J. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857726 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cosmology of a holographic induced gravity model with curvature effects
Bouhmadi-López, M., Errahmani, A., & Ouali, T. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.083508 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Proof of the quantum null energy condition for free fermionic field theories
Malik, T. A., & Lopez-Mobilia, R. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.066028 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bekenstein, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bekenstein, Jacob D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1981-01-15
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-298
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011757658
- Cited by
- 1,182
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
- Keywords
- black hole thermodynamics, second law of thermodynamics, thought experiments, microcanonical ensemble, gibbons, closed universe, self-gravity, quantum gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review