CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 94Relativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Differential Geometry ResearchQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

Geometrical origin of gauge theories

Gambini, R., Trias, A.·1981·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.23.553
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The identification of a basic geometric group structure acting on the manifold of paths $P(M)$ of some manifold $M$ enables us to derive all the kinematical elements of a gauge theory from the single postulate of invariance of the formulation under this group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.23.553

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 94

Authors
Gambini, R., & Trias, A.
Affiliations
Universidad Simón Bolívar (VE)
ORCID
Gambini, R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1981-01-15
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
553-555
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.23.553
OpenAlex
W2033705810
Cited by
94
References
7
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
gauge theory, group invariance, gauge groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review