Cited by 1,257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?

Zurek, W. H.·1981·Physical Review D

Abstract

The form of the interaction Hamiltonian between the apparatus and its environment is sufficient to determine which observable of the measured quantum system can be considered "recorded" by the apparatus. The basis that contains this record---the pointer basis of the apparatus---consists of the eigenvectors of the operator which commutes with the apparatus-environment interaction Hamiltonian. Thus the environment can be said to perform a nondemolition measurement of an observable diagonal in the pointer basis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.24.1516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. J. von Neumann, 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik
  2. J. von Neumann, 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
  3. H. Everett, 1957, Rev. Mod. Phys., 29, 454, 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454 · DOI · Paper page
  4. L. Landau, 1931, Z. Phys., 69, 56, 10.1007/BF01391513 · DOI
  5. D. Bohm, 1951, Quantum Theory
  6. V. B. Braginsky, 1977, Measurement of Weak Forces in Physics Experiments
  7. V. B. Braginsky, 1978, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 27, 296
  8. K. S. Thorne, 1978, Phys. Rev. Lett., 40, 667, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.667 · DOI
  9. K. S. Thorne, 1979, Sources of Gravitational Radiation
  10. W. G. Unruh, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 2888, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2888 · DOI
  11. H. Wakita, 1962, Prog. Theor. Phys., 27, 139, 10.1143/PTP.27.139 · DOI
  12. E. P. Wigner, 1963, Am. J. Phys., 31, 368, 10.1119/1.1969254 · DOI · Paper page
  13. M. Scully, 1978, Phys. Rep., 43C, 485, 10.1016/0370-1573(78)90210-7 · DOI
  14. E. P. Wigner, 1962, The Scientist Speculates
  15. E. P. Wigner, 1967, Symmetries and Reflections
  16. J. A. Wheeler, 1978, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory
  17. W. K. Wootters, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 473, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.473 · DOI
  18. F. London, 1939, La Theorie de l'Observation en Mecanique Quantique
  19. C. M. Caves, 1980, Rev. Mod. Phys., 52, 341, 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.341 · DOI
  20. M. Jammer, 1974, The Philosophical Development of Quantum Mechanics
  21. J. A. Wheeler, 1979, Frontiers of Time
  22. H. D. Zeh, 1971, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
  23. E. P. Wigner, Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, lecture notes of E. P. Wigner in Quantum Theory of Measurement
  24. E. P. Wigner, invited lecture at the IVth Inter-American Undergraduate Conference in Theoretical Physics, The University of Texas, 1981
  25. M. Simonius, 1978, Phys. Rev. Lett., 40, 980, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.980 · DOI
  26. B. Misra, 1977, J. Math. Phys., 18, 756, 10.1063/1.523304 · DOI
  27. C. B. Chiu, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 16, 520, 10.1103/PhysRevD.16.520 · DOI
  28. A. Peres, 1978, Am. J. Phys., 46, 745, 10.1119/1.11393 · DOI · Paper page
  29. A. Peres, 1980, Am. J. Phys., 48, 931, 10.1119/1.12204 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,257

Metadata

Authors
Zurek, W. H.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1981-09-15
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1516-1525
ISSN
0556-2821
Cited by
1,257
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review