Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 762

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supersymmetry at ordinary energies. Masses and conservation laws

Weinberg, Steven·1982·Physical Review D

Abstract

An assessment is made of the general problems encountered in formulating a realistic supersymmetric theory in which the spontaneous breakdown of supersymmetry occurs at ordinary energies accessible to accelerators. As a starting point, three problems are identified in SU(3)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}SU(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}U(1) supersymmetric models with only quark and lepton chiral superfields: the up quarks get no masses, baryon and lepton ($B$ and $L$) conservation are violated by renormalizable and hence unsuppressed interactions, and the scalar counterparts of the quarks and leptons are too light. An interesting SU(3)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}SU(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}U(1) model of Dimopoulos and Georgi that avoids these problems is considered; it is found that this model contains $B$- and $L$-nonconserving effective interactions of dimensionality 5 that lead to proton decay at too rapid a rate. To guarantee natural $B$ and $L$ conservation in effective interactions of dimensionality 4 and 5, it is suggested that the gauge group that describes physics at ordinary energies contains a factor, such as another U(1), in addition to SU(3)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}SU(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}U(1). Such theories do not contain dimension-5 $L$-nonconserving interactions which could produce an observable neutrino mass, but they do allow dimension-6 $B$- and $L$-nonconserving interactions that would lead to proton decay at an observable rate. Supersymmetry is found to constrain the matrix elements for proton decay in a phenomenologically interesting way. A general explanation is given of how such theories naturally avoid the problem of light scalars, as found by Fayet. The formalism is used to derive general approximate mass relations for the scalar superpartners of the quarks and leptons. The problem of anomalies in the new U(1) current is considered, and one attractive scheme for avoiding them is offered, in which the anomalies cancel for precisely three generations of quarks and leptons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.26.287

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 762

Metadata

Authors
Weinberg, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1982-07-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
287-302
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111471335
Cited by
762
References
1
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.