Cited by 644Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. II

Parker, Leonard·1971·Physical Review D

Abstract

We consider the spin-\textonehalf{} field which satisfies the fully covariant generalization of the Dirac equation. The metric, which is not quantized, is that of an expanding universe with Euclidean 3-space. The field is quantized in a manner consistent with the time development dictated by the equation of motion. Consideration of the special-relativistic limit then provides a new proof of the connection between spin and statistics. In general, there will be production of spin-\textonehalf{} particles as a result of the expansion of the universe. However, we show that in the limits of zero and infinite mass there is no spin-\textonehalf{} particle production. For arbitrary mass, we obtain an upper bound on the creation of particles of given momentum. We treat the case of an instantaneous expansion exactly (but not taking into account the reaction of the particle creation back on the gravitational field). For such an expansion, the created particle density, when integrated over all momenta, diverges as a result of the high-momentum behavior. We also consider the Friedmann expansion of a radiation-filled universe, emphasizing the effect of the initial stage of the expansion. We obtain the asymptotic form of the created particle density for large momenta, and thus show that the particle density, integrated over all momenta, is finite, in contrast to the previous case.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.3.346

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To identify our universe with a universe in a black hole, quantum effects in curved spacetime must be included; these are responsible for particle production by the gravitational field.

    “To identify our universe with a universe in a black hole, we must include quantum effects in curved spacetime, which are responsible for particle production by the gravitational field (Parker 1968(Parker , 1969;;Zel'dovich 1970;Parker 1971aParker , 1971b;;Zel'dovich & Starobinskii 1977).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Parker 1971a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Parker, Leonard
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1971-01-15
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
346-356
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2176395030
Cited by
644
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
particle creation, cosmic expansion, quantized fields, spin-1/2 fields, covariant Dirac equation, spin-statistics theorem, particle density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review