Effect of particle creation on Kaluza-Klein cosmologies
Abstract
One of the attempts that try to explain the smallness of the internal space in Kaluza-Klein theories is the attractive idea of cosmological dimensional reduction proposed by Chodos and Detweiler and by Freund. In these theories, the internal space shrinks to an unobservable scale by the dynamical evolution of the anisotropic universe. However, if we consider a quantized matter field, the higher-dimensional anisotropic space-time may be isotropized by the effect of particle creation as suggested by Zel'dovich in the case of a conventional four-dimensional space-time. Here, we show that this isotropization process is rather rapid and the mechanism of cosmological dimensional reduction does not work well in the case of space-time with ${M}_{4}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{S}^{1}$ topology. We also show that the above result holds even if we take into account the adiabatic regularization term. We give the analytic solution in the case of space-time with ${M}_{4}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{T}^{D}$ topology under some approximation and show that the idea of cosmological dimensional reduction in this case is also broken.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The adiabatic regularization procedure introduced by Parker and Fulling has only been shown equivalent to point-splitting when the scalar field is massless and conformally coupled and the spacetime M^{1,d-1}×S^1 is conformally flat (scale factors equal).
“The adiabatic regularization procedure introduced by Parker and Fulling [29,30], though well suited to cosmology, has only been shown to be equivalent to point-splitting when the scalar field is massless and conformally coupled, and the spacetime Mfoot_0, d-1 × S 1 is conformally flat i.e. when the scale factors of the two product spaces are equal [31].”
From Stress-energy tensor of a scalar field on a product spacetime with a time-dependent compact dimension (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Anisotropy damping through quantum effects in the early universe
Hu, B. L., & Parker, L. (1978) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.933 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Hartle, J. B., & Hu, B. L. (1979) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1772 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul, A., & Paban, S. (2026) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2026)188
- Authors
- Maeda, K.-I.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Maeda, Kei-ichi
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1984-12-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2482-2494
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060830792
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- Kaluza-Klein cosmology, particle creation, anisotropic universe, isotropization, internal space, compactified extra dimensions, adiabatic regularization, higher-dimensional spacetime, analytical solution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review