Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decaying particles do not ‘‘heat up’’ the Universe

Scherrer, Robert J., Turner, Michael S.·1985·Physical Review D

Abstract

It is usually assumed that a massive relic species, which comes to dominate the mass density of the Universe and later decays, ``heats up'' the Universe when the age of the Universe \ensuremath{\simeq} its lifetime. We show that if its decay follows the usual exponential decay law, then the Universe is never reheated, rather it just cools more slowly. We calculate the evolution of the temperature and entropy, and find that to within numerical factors of order unity, the usual estimates for the entropy increase are correct. Our results have implications for primordial nucleosynthesis in scenarios where a massive relic with lifetime \ensuremath{\simeq} ${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}2}$--${10}^{3}$ sec is present, and for baryogenesis in the new inflationary Universe scenario.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.31.681

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Scherrer, R. J., & Turner, M. S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1985-02-15
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
681-688
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970316485
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decaying particles do not ‘‘heat up’’ the Universe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.31.681
The paper
Scherrer, R. J., & Turner, M. S. (1985). Decaying particles do not ‘‘heat up’’ the Universe. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.31.681

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.