Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Particle creation in de Sitter space

Mottola, E.·1985·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.31.754
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this, the first of a series of papers on quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime, the invariant vacuum state appropriate for inflationary models of the early universe is identified and shown to decay due to the Hawking effect. The created pairs have an energy-momentum which leads to a first-order decrease of the effective cosmological constant, independently of any matter phase transition. A mechanism for dynamically relaxing ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0}$ is thereby suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.31.754

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
Mottola, E.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1985-02-15
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
754-766
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.31.754
OpenAlex
W2132949476
Cited by
536
References
18
FWCI
15.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.