Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm

Hoskins, J. K., Newman, R. D., Spero, R., Schultz, J.·1985·Physical Review D

Abstract

We report two experiments which test the inverse-square distance dependence of the Newtonian gravitational force law. One experiment uses a torsion balance consisting of a 60-cm-long copper bar suspended at its midpoint by a tungsten wire, to compare the torque produced by copper masses 105 cm from the balance axis with the torque produced by a copper mass 5 cm from the side of the balance bar, near its end. Defining ${R}_{\mathrm{expt}}$ to be the measured ratio of the torques due to the masses at 105 cm and 5 cm, and ${R}_{\mathrm{Newton}}$ to be the corresponding ratio computed assuming an inverse-square force law, we find \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\equiv}(${R}_{\mathrm{expt}}$/${R}_{\mathrm{Newton}}$-1)=(1.2 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}4}$. Assuming a force deviating from an inverse-square distance dependence by a factor [1+\ensuremath{\epsilon} lnr(cm)], this result implies \ensuremath{\epsilon}=(0.5 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}4}$. An earlier experiment, which has been reported previously, is described here in detail. This experiment tested the inverse-square law over a distance range of approximately 2 to 5 cm, by probing the gravitational field inside a steel mass tube using a copper test mass suspended from the end of a torsion balance bar. This experiment yielded a value for the parameter \ensuremath{\epsilon} defined above: \ensuremath{\epsilon}=(1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}5}$. The results of both of these experiments are in good agreement with the Newton- ian prediction. Limits on the strength and range of a Yukawa potential term superimposed on the Newtonian gravitational potential are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.32.3084

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Hoskins, J. K., Newman, R. D., Spero, R., & Schultz, J.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1985-12-15
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
3084-3095
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152863201
Cited by
302
References
0
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.32.3084
The paper
Hoskins, J. K., Newman, R. D., Spero, R., & Schultz, J. (1985). Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.32.3084

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.