The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm
Abstract
We report two experiments which test the inverse-square distance dependence of the Newtonian gravitational force law. One experiment uses a torsion balance consisting of a 60-cm-long copper bar suspended at its midpoint by a tungsten wire, to compare the torque produced by copper masses 105 cm from the balance axis with the torque produced by a copper mass 5 cm from the side of the balance bar, near its end. Defining ${R}_{\mathrm{expt}}$ to be the measured ratio of the torques due to the masses at 105 cm and 5 cm, and ${R}_{\mathrm{Newton}}$ to be the corresponding ratio computed assuming an inverse-square force law, we find \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\equiv}(${R}_{\mathrm{expt}}$/${R}_{\mathrm{Newton}}$-1)=(1.2 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}4}$. Assuming a force deviating from an inverse-square distance dependence by a factor [1+\ensuremath{\epsilon} lnr(cm)], this result implies \ensuremath{\epsilon}=(0.5 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}4}$. An earlier experiment, which has been reported previously, is described here in detail. This experiment tested the inverse-square law over a distance range of approximately 2 to 5 cm, by probing the gravitational field inside a steel mass tube using a copper test mass suspended from the end of a torsion balance bar. This experiment yielded a value for the parameter \ensuremath{\epsilon} defined above: \ensuremath{\epsilon}=(1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}5}$. The results of both of these experiments are in good agreement with the Newton- ian prediction. Limits on the strength and range of a Yukawa potential term superimposed on the Newtonian gravitational potential are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Khoury, J., & Weltman, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.044026 · Cited by 1,634
Advances in the Casimir Effect
Bordag, M., Klimchitskaya, G. L., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238743.001.0001 · Cited by 1,284
Tests of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law below the Dark-Energy Length Scale
Kapner, D. J., Cook, T. S., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Heckel, B. R., Hoyle, C. D., & Swanson, H. E. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.021101 · Cited by 984
T ESTS OF THE G RAVITATIONAL I NVERSE-S QUARE L AW
Adelberger, E. G., Heckel, B. R., & Nelson, A. E. (2003) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110503 · Cited by 819
Submillimeter tests of the gravitational inverse-square law
Hoyle, C. D., Kapner, D. J., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Schmidt, U., & Swanson, H. E. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.042004 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoskins, J. K., Newman, R. D., Spero, R., & Schultz, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1985-12-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3084-3095
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152863201
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.32.3084
- The paper
- Hoskins, J. K., Newman, R. D., Spero, R., & Schultz, J. (1985). Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.32.3084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.