The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectral decomposition of the perturbation response of the Schwarzschild geometry
Abstract
The radiative Green's function for the one-dimensional wave equation with the Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli potentials is formally constructed from recently developed analytic representations for generalized spheroidal wave functions, and decomposed into a convergent sum over quasinormal modes, an integral around a branch cut in the frequency domain, and a high-frequency remnant of the free-space propagator. This paper discusses the contribution to the time response made by the quasinormal modes and, at very late times, by the branch-cut integral. The initial-value problem is considered for source fields with both compact and extended radial dependences, and the problem of the formal divergence of the integrals of extended sources over quasinormal-mode wave functions is solved. The branch-cut integral produces a weak late-time radiative power-law decay tail that will characterize the astrophysically observed radiation spectrum for times subsequent to the exponential decay of the quasinormal ringing, when (ct-${r}_{\mathrm{*}}$)\ensuremath{\gg}2MG/${c}^{2}$ and (ct-${r}_{\mathrm{*}}$)/${r}_{\mathrm{*}}$\ensuremath{\ll}1. This radiative decay tail is shown to diminish to Price's nonradiative tail in the final limit ct/${r}_{\mathrm{*}}$\ensuremath{\gg}1. The method is applied to a characteristic-value problem used to model the gravitational collapse of massive stars, and to the small-body radial in-fall problem. The analysis presented is generalizable, through the Newman-Penrose formalism and Teukolsky's equations, to obtain the radiative Green's function for perturbations to the Kerr geometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Cited by
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes
Kokkotas, K. D., & Schmidt, B. G. (1999) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-1999-2 · Cited by 2,055
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Casals, M. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.024013 · Cited by 334
Wave propagation in gravitational systems: Late time behavior
Ching, E. S. C., Leung, P. T., Suen, W. M., & Young, K. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.2118 · Cited by 279
Quasinormal modes of Reissner-Nordström black holes
Leaver, E. W. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.2986 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leaver, E. W.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1986-07-15
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 384-408
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4295932358
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.