Adiabatic regularization in closed Robertson-Walker universes
Abstract
Adiabatic regularization is a particularly efficient method of regularization for numerical studies of the dynamics of quantum scalar fields in homogeneous cosmological spacetimes. We show that of the possible ways to apply adiabatic regularization in a closed Robertson-Walker universe, only one yields the accepted trace anomaly and vacuum energy for a conformal scalar field. The method is to use the continuum measure appropriate to a flat space, while otherwise retaining the form of the subtractions appropriate to a closed space. We also show that this procedure is equivalent to point splitting, although technically much simpler.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 0th order expressions match known results for the time-independent case.
“The 0-th order expressions, which may be interpreted as the Casimir energy/pressures, match known results for the time-independent case [34,38].”
From Stress-energy tensor of a scalar field on a product spacetime with a time-dependent compact dimension (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Trace anomaly of a conformally invariant quantum field in curved spacetime
Wald, R. M. (1978) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.1477 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Anisotropy damping through quantum effects in the early universe
Hu, B. L., & Parker, L. (1978) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.933 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Self-citationWald, R. M. (1978) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(78)90040-4 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Quantum effects in the Gowdy T3 cosmology
Berger, B. K. (1984) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90214-8 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paul, A., & Paban, S. (2026) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2026)188
- Authors
- Anderson, P. R., & Parker, L.
- Affiliations
- Montana State University (US)
- ORCID
- Anderson, Paul R.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1987-11-15
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2963-2969
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029668661
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- adiabatic regularization, quantum scalar field, conformally coupled scalar field, trace anomaly, vacuum energy, point-splitting, renormalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review