The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross sections, relic abundance, and detection rates for neutralino dark matter
Abstract
Neutralino annihilation and elastic scattering cross sections are derived which differ in important ways from previous work. These are applied to relic abundance calculations and to direct detection of neutralino dark matter from the galactic halo. Assuming the neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle and that it is less massive than the ${Z}^{0}$, we find relic densities of neutralinos greater than 4% of critical density for almost all values of the supersymmetric parameters. We constrain the parameter space by using results from the DESY ${e}^{+}$${e}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ storage ring PETRA (chargino mass less than 23 GeV) and the ASP detector at the SLAC storage ring PEP, and then assuming a critical density of neutralinos, display event rates in a cryogenic detector for a variety of models. A new term implies ``spin-independent'' elastic scattering even for these Majorana particles and inclusion of propagator momenta increases detection rates by 10--300 % even for pure photinos. ${Z}^{0}$-squark interference leads to very low detection rates for some values of the parameters. The new term in the elastic cross section dominates for heavy, mostly spinless materials and mitigates the negative interference cancellations in light materials, except for the pure photino or pure Higgsino cases where it does not contribute. In general, the rates can be substantially different from the pure photino and pure Higgsino special cases usually considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Akerib, D. S., Attisha, M. J., Bailey, C. N., Baudis, L., Bauer, D. A., Brink, P. L., Brusov, P. P., Bunker, R., Cabrera, B., Caldwell, D. O., et al. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.011302 · Cited by 331
Core formation in dwarf haloes with self-interacting dark matter: no fine-tuning necessary
Elbert, O. D., Bullock, J. S., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Rocha, M., Oñorbe, J., & Peter, A. H. G. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1470 · Cited by 306
DARK MATTER DETECTION IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
MUÑOZ, C. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04018154 · Cited by 299
Chattopadhyay, U., Corsetti, A., & Nath, P. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.035005 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Griest, K.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1988-10-15
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2357-2375
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037514055
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross sections, relic abundance, and detection rates for neutralino dark matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.38.2357
- The paper
- Griest, K. (1988). Cross sections, relic abundance, and detection rates for neutralino dark matter. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.38.2357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.