Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole

Echeverria, Fernando·1989·Physical Review D

Abstract

A deformed black hole produced in a cataclysmic astrophysical event should undergo damped vibrations which emit gravitational radiation. By fitting the observed gravitational waveform h(t) to the waveform predicted for black-hole vibrations, it should be possible to deduce the hole's mass M and dimensionless rotation parameter a=(c/G)(angular momentum)/${M}^{2}$. This paper estimates the accuracy with which M and a can be determined by optimal signal processing of data from laser-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors. It is assumed that the detector noise has a white spectrum and has been made Gaussian by cross correlation of detectors at different sites. Assuming, also, that only the most slowly damped mode (which has spheroidal harmonic indices l=m=2) is significantly excited---as probably will be the case for a hole formed by the coalescence of a neutron-star binary or a black-hole binary---it is found that the one-sigma uncertainties in M and a are \ensuremath{\Delta}M/M\ensuremath{\simeq}2.2${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(1-a${)}^{0.45}$, \ensuremath{\Delta}a\ensuremath{\simeq}5.9${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(1-a${)}^{1.06}$, where \ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\simeq}${h}_{s}$(\ensuremath{\pi}${S}_{h}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$ (1-a${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}0.22}$. Here \ensuremath{\rho} is the amplitude signal-to-noise ratio at the output of the optimal filter, ${h}_{s}$ is the wave's amplitude at the beginning of the vibrations, f is the wave's frequency (the angular frequency \ensuremath{\omega} divided by 2\ensuremath{\pi}), and ${S}_{h}$ is the frequency-independent spectral density of the detectors' noise. These formulas for \ensuremath{\Delta}M and \ensuremath{\Delta}a are valid only for \ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}10. Corrections to these approximate formulas are given in Table II.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.40.3194

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Echeverria, F.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1989-11-15
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
3194-3203
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995217152
Cited by
313
References
0
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.40.3194
The paper
Echeverria, F. (1989). Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.40.3194

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.