The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole
Abstract
A deformed black hole produced in a cataclysmic astrophysical event should undergo damped vibrations which emit gravitational radiation. By fitting the observed gravitational waveform h(t) to the waveform predicted for black-hole vibrations, it should be possible to deduce the hole's mass M and dimensionless rotation parameter a=(c/G)(angular momentum)/${M}^{2}$. This paper estimates the accuracy with which M and a can be determined by optimal signal processing of data from laser-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors. It is assumed that the detector noise has a white spectrum and has been made Gaussian by cross correlation of detectors at different sites. Assuming, also, that only the most slowly damped mode (which has spheroidal harmonic indices l=m=2) is significantly excited---as probably will be the case for a hole formed by the coalescence of a neutron-star binary or a black-hole binary---it is found that the one-sigma uncertainties in M and a are \ensuremath{\Delta}M/M\ensuremath{\simeq}2.2${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(1-a${)}^{0.45}$, \ensuremath{\Delta}a\ensuremath{\simeq}5.9${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(1-a${)}^{1.06}$, where \ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\simeq}${h}_{s}$(\ensuremath{\pi}${S}_{h}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$ (1-a${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}0.22}$. Here \ensuremath{\rho} is the amplitude signal-to-noise ratio at the output of the optimal filter, ${h}_{s}$ is the wave's amplitude at the beginning of the vibrations, f is the wave's frequency (the angular frequency \ensuremath{\omega} divided by 2\ensuremath{\pi}), and ${S}_{h}$ is the frequency-independent spectral density of the detectors' noise. These formulas for \ensuremath{\Delta}M and \ensuremath{\Delta}a are valid only for \ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}10. Corrections to these approximate formulas are given in Table II.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 1,754
Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory
Konoplya, R. A., & Zhidenko, A. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.793 · Cited by 1,532
Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.241102 · Cited by 1,021
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Casals, M. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.024013 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Echeverria, F.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1989-11-15
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3194-3203
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995217152
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.40.3194
- The paper
- Echeverria, F. (1989). Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.40.3194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.