Cited by 432Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Higher-derivative Lagrangians, nonlocality, problems, and solutions

Simon, Jonathan Z.·1990·Physical Review D

Abstract

Higher-derivative theories are frequently avoided because of undesirable properties, yet they occur naturally as corrections to general relativity and cosmic strings. We discuss some of their more interesting and disturbing problems, with examples. A natural method of removing all the problems of higher derivatives is reviewed. This method of "perturbative constraints" is required for at least one class of higher-derivative theories---those which are associated with nonlocality. Nonlocality often appears in low-energy theories described by effective actions. The method may also be applied to a wide class of other higher-derivative theories. An example system is solved, exactly and perturbatively, for which the perturbative solutions approximate the exact solutions only when the method of "perturbative constraints" is employed. Ramifications for corrections to general relativity, cosmic strings with rigidity terms, and other higher-derivative theories are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.41.3720

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For closed spacetimes, the proper quantity to subtract using the adiabatic method should be constructed from mode solutions with a continuum measure instead of a discrete one.

    “It has been argued that in such situations, the proper quantity to subtract using the adiabatic method should still be constructed from mode solutions with a continuum measure instead of a discrete one [36].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 432

Authors
Simon, J. Z.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Simon, Jonathan Z.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1990-06-15
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
3720-3733
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170609994
Cited by
432
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
higher-derivative theories, nonlocality, effective action, cosmic strings, exact solutions, perturbation solution, effective field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review