Cited by 190Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Real tunneling geometries and the large-scale topology of the universe

Gibbons, G. W., Hartle, J. B.·1990·Physical Review D

Abstract

If the topology and geometry of spacetime are quantum-mechanically variable, then the particular classical large-scale topology and geometry observed in our universe must be statistical predictions of its initial condition. This paper examines the predictions of the ``no boundary'' initial condition for the present large-scale topology and geometry. Finite-action real tunneling solutions of Einstein's equation are important for such predictions. These consist of compact Riemannian (Euclidean) geometries joined to a Lorentzian cosmological geometry across a spacelike surface of vanishing extrinsic curvature. The classification of such solutions is discussed and general constraints on their topology derived. For example, it is shown that, if the Euclidean Ricci tensor is positive, then a real tunneling solution can nucleate only a single connected Lorentzian spacetime (the unique conception theorem). Explicit examples of real tunneling solutions driven by a cosmological constant are exhibited and their implications for cosmic baldness described. It is argued that the most probable large-scale spacetime predicted by the real tunneling solutions of the ``no-boundary'' initial condition has the topology R\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${\mathit{S}}^{3}$ with the de Sitter metric.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.42.2458

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If Riemannian signature is allowed, the path integral makes sense for any spatial topology, and if Σ is totally geodesic one can smoothly join a Lorentzian metric at Σ.

    “If one allows Riemannian signature, on the other hand, such a path integral makes sense for any spatial topology, and if one further requires that Σ be totally geodesic — that is, that the extrinsic curvature of Σ vanish — one can smoothly join on a Lorentzian metric at Σ [141].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibbons, G. W., & Hartle, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1990-10-15
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
2458-2468
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104986635
Cited by
190
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
de Sitter metric, cosmological constant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review