The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thermal relics: Do we know their abundances?
Abstract
The relic abundance of a particle species that was once in thermal equilibrium in the expanding Universe depends upon a competition between the annihilation rate of the species and the expansion rate of the Universe. Assuming that the Universe is radiation dominated at early times the relic abundance is easy to compute and well known. At times earlier than about 1 sec after the bang there is little or no evidence that the Universe had to be radiation dominated, although that is the simplest--and standard--assumption. Because early-Universe relics are of such importance both to particle physics and to cosmology, we consider in detail three nonstandard possibilities for the Universe at the time a species' abundance froze in: energy density dominated by shear (i.e., anisotropic expansion), energy density dominated by some other nonrelativistic species, and energy density dominated by the kinetic energy of the scalar field that sets the gravitational constant in a Brans-Dicke-Jordan cosmological model. In the second case the relic abundance is less than the standard value, while in the other two cases it can be enhanced by a significant factor. We also mention two other more exotic possibilities for enhancing the relic abundance of a species--a larger value of Newton's constant at early times (e.g., as might occur in superstring or Kaluza-Klein theories) or a component of the energy density at early times with a very stiff equation of state (p>\ensuremath{\rho}/3), e.g., a scalar field \ensuremath{\varphi} with potential V(\ensuremath{\varphi})=\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Vert}}}^{\mathit{n}}$ with n>4. Our results have implications for dark-matter searches and searches for particle relics in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Cited by
Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model
Gelmini, G., & Gondolo, P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.023510 · Cited by 305
Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments
Sigurdson, K., Doran, M., Kurylov, A., Caldwell, R. R., & Kamionkowski, M. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083501 · Cited by 300
Self-citationDARK MATTER DETECTION IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
MUÑOZ, C. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04018154 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamionkowski, M., & Turner, M. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1990-11-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3310-3320
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086764681
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal relics: Do we know their abundances? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.42.3310
- The paper
- Kamionkowski, M., & Turner, M. S. (1990). Thermal relics: Do we know their abundances? Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.42.3310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.