The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances
Abstract
The calculation of relic abundances of elementary particles by following their annihilation and freeze-out in the early Universe has become an important and standard tool in discussing particle dark-matter candidates. We find three situations, all occurring in the literature, in which the standard methods of calculating relic abundances fail. The first situation occurs when another particle lies near in mass to the relic particle and shares a quantum number with it. An example is a light squark with neutralino dark matter. The additional particle must be included in the reaction network, since its annihilation can control the relic abundance. The second situation occurs when the relic particle lies near a mass threshold. Previously, annihilation into particles heavier than the relic particle was considered kinematically forbidden, but we show that if the mass difference is \ensuremath{\sim}5-15%, these "forbidden" channels can dominate the cross section and determine the relic abundance. The third situation occurs when the annihilation takes place near a pole in the cross section. Proper treatment of the thermal averaging and the annihilation after freeze-out shows that the dip in relic abundance caused by a pole is not nearly as sharp or deep as previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy-Neutrino Masses
Lee, B. W., & Weinberg, S. (1977) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.165 · Cited by 1,449
Calculations of relic densities in the early universe
Srednicki, M., Watkins, R., & Olive, K. A. (1988) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90099-5 · Cited by 395
Cosmic asymmetry, neutrinos and the sun
Griest, K., & Seckel, D. (1987) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90293-8 · Cited by 356
Self-citationOn the relic, cosmic abundance of stable, weakly interacting massive particles
Scherrer, R. J., & Turner, M. S. (1986) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.33.1585 · Cited by 259
Limits on masses and number of neutral weakly interacting particles
Hut, P. (1977) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90139-3 · Cited by 227
Cosmological Upper Bound on Heavy-Neutrino Lifetimes
Dicus, D. A., Kolb, E. W., & Teplitz, V. L. (1977) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.168 · Cited by 205
Supersymmetric dark matter above the W mass
Griest, K., Kamionkowski, M., & Turner, M. S. (1990) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.3565 · Cited by 154
Self-citationCosmological Constraints on the Mass and the Number of Heavy Lepton Neutrinos
Sato, K., & Kobayashi, M. A. R. (1977) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.58.1775 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 · Cited by 1,241
The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
Ellwanger, U., Hugonie, C., & Teixeira, A. M. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 · Cited by 992
Metadata
- Authors
- Griest, K., & Seckel, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1991-05-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3191-3203
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2202858735
- Cited by
- 1,380
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.43.3191
- The paper
- Griest, K., & Seckel, D. (1991). Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.43.3191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.