Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis for magnetic moment and electric dipole moment form factors of the top quark viae+e−→tt¯

Atwood, D., Soni, A.·1992·Physical Review D

Abstract

Phenomenological analysis for determining the magnetic moment and electic dipole moment form factors of the top quark via the reaction ${\mathit{e}}^{+}$${\mathit{e}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}tt\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}, followed by the decays t\ensuremath{\rightarrow}${\mathit{bW}}^{+}$ and t\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}b\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}${\mathit{W}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$, is presented, with analytic expressions for the differential cross section and decay given. Various experimental observables are studied and their efficacy for the determination of form factors is considered and compared with the optimal resolution of form factors in the tt\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}\ensuremath{\gamma} and tt\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}Z vertices. We find that with a sample of 10000 events it is possible to put limits of ${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}18}$--${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}19}$ e cm for the form factors considered, evaluated at ${\mathit{q}}^{2}$=s when \ensuremath{\surd}s \ensuremath{\approxeq}500 GeV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.45.2405

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Atwood, D., & Soni, A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
2405-2413
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075220162
Cited by
235
References
1
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.