Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effective potential at finite temperature in the standard model

Carrington, M. E.·1992·Physical Review D

Abstract

There has been much recent interest in the nature of the electroweak phase transition. This information is of importance in the context of the sphaleron models that have recently been proposed to explain the observed net baryon number in the Universe. The presence of a term that is cubic in the Higgs condensate in the one-loop effective potential appears to indicate a first-order phase transition. However, the infrared singularities inherent in massless models produce cubic terms that are of the same order in the coupling. In this paper, we include these terms and show that the standard model has a first-order phase transition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.45.2933

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Carrington, M. E.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1992-04-15
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
2933-2944
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103473480
Cited by
478
References
5
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.