The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron- and muon-neutrino content of the atmospheric flux
Abstract
Neutrino interactions from a 7.7 kton yr exposure of the IMB-3 detector are analyzed. A total of 935 contained events radiating over \ensuremath{\sim}50 MeV of \ifmmode \check{C}\else \v{C}\fi{}erenkov-equivalent energy and consistent with atmospheric neutrino interactions are identified. Of these, 610 have a single \ifmmode \check{C}\else \v{C}\fi{}erenkov ring. Single-ring interactions are efficiently separated into those containing a showering particle (produced mainly by ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$) and those containing a nonshowering particle (produced mainly by ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$). In the momentum range $100<{p}_{e}<1500$ MeV/c and $300<{p}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}<1500$ MeV/c, the fraction of nonshowering events is 0.36\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02(stat)\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02(syst). Based on detailed models of neutrino production and interaction, a fraction of 0.51\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01(stat)\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05(syst) is expected. This deficit of nonshowering, or excess of showering, events relative to the total is supported by an independent analysis of muon decay signals. In the same sample 33\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2(stat)% of events are accompanied by one or more muon decays, while 43\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1(stat)% are expected. Further studies that could reduce systematic errors and discover the cause of these discrepancies are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence for an Oscillatory Signature in Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations
Ashie, Y., Hosaka, J., Ishihara, K., Itow, Y., Kameda, J., Koshio, Y., Minamino, A., Mitsuda, C., Miura, M., Moriyama, S., et al. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.101801 · Cited by 609
Self-citationDark energy from mass varying neutrinos
Fardon, R., Nelson, A. E., & Weiner, N. (2004) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/10/005 · Cited by 414
Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations
Kajita, T. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.030501 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker-Szendy, R., Bratton, C. B., Casper, D., Dye, S. T., Gajewski, W., Goldhaber, M., Haines, T. J., Halverson, P. G., Kielczewska, D., Kropp, W. R., Learned, J. G., LoSecco, J. M., Matsuno, S., McGrath, G., McGrew, C., Miller, R., Price, L. R., Reines, F., Schultz, J., Sobel, H. W., Stone, J. L., Sulak, L. R., & Svoboda, R.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3720-3724
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011804578
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron- and muon-neutrino content of the atmospheric flux. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.46.3720
- The paper
- Becker-Szendy, R., Bratton, C. B., Casper, D., Dye, S. T., Gajewski, W., Goldhaber, M., Haines, T. J., Halverson, P. G., Kielczewska, D., Kropp, W. R., Learned, J. G., LoSecco, J. M., Matsuno, S., McGrath, G., McGrew, C., Miller, R., Price, L. R., Reines, F., Schultz, J., . . . Svoboda, R. (1992). Electron- and muon-neutrino content of the atmospheric flux. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.46.3720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.