The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Renormalization-group study of the standard model and its extensions: The standard model
Abstract
In this paper we present a comprehensive analysis of the running of all the couplings of the standard model to two loops, including threshold effects. Our purpose is twofold---to determine what the running of these parameters may indicate for the physics of the standard model and to provide a template for the study of its extensions up to the Planck mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gasser, J., & Leutwyler, H. (1982) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(82)90035-7 · Cited by 1,753
Cited by
Bare Higgs mass at Planck scale
Hamada, Y., Kawai, H., & Oda, K.-Y. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.053009 · Cited by 104
Quantum corrections to the cosmological evolution of conformally coupled fields
Cembranos, J. A. R., Olive, K. A., Peloso, M., & Uzan, J.-P. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/07/025 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Arason, H., Castaño, D. J., Kesthelyi, B., Mikaelian, S., Piard, E. J., Ramond, P., & Wright, B. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3945-3965
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145202687
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renormalization-group study of the standard model and its extensions: The standard model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.46.3945
- The paper
- Arason, H., Castaño, D. J., Kesthelyi, B., Mikaelian, S., Piard, E. J., Ramond, P., & Wright, B. D. (1992). Renormalization-group study of the standard model and its extensions: The standard model. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.46.3945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
