Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pseudostable bubbles

Open access
Gleiser, Marcelo·1994·Physical Review D

Abstract

The evolution of spherically symmetric unstable scalar field configurations ("bubbles") is examined for both symmetric and asymmetric double-well potentials. Bubbles with initial static energies ${E}_{0}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{E}_{\mathrm{crit}}$, where ${E}_{\mathrm{crit}}$ is some critical value, shrink in a time scale determined by their linear dimension or "radius." Bubbles with ${E}_{0}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{E}_{\mathrm{crit}}$ evolve into time-dependent, localized configurations which are very long-lived compared to characteristic time scales in the models examined. The stability of these configurations is investigated and possible applications are briefly discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.49.2978

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Gleiser, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1994-03-15
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
2978-2981
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1623011111
Cited by
277
References
11
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudostable bubbles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.49.2978
The paper
Gleiser, M. (1994). Pseudostable bubbles. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.49.2978

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.