Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yukawa coupling unification with supersymmetric threshold corrections

Open access
Hempfling, R.·1994·Physical Review D

Abstract

Radiative corrections to the down-type fermion masses at the supersymmetric threshold are enhanced by the ratio of vacuum expectation values, $tan\ensuremath{\beta}$. This can have a strong impact on the unification of Yukawa couplings in supersymmetric grand unified theories. We present an example of such a model with a horizontal gauge symmetry that naturally explains the fermion mass hierarchy and the small mixing angles of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix. The unification of the lepton and the down-quark Yukawa couplings is achieved without introducing large Higgs multiplets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.49.6168

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Hempfling, R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1994-06-01
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
6168-6172
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132620769
Cited by
363
References
1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.