Dynamics of black hole apparent horizons
Abstract
Dynamic black hole spacetimes are studied by examining the evolution of apparent horizons surrounding the holes. We performed numerical evolutions of three different initial data sets: nonrotating black holes distorted by time symmetric (Brill) gravitational waves, distorted rotating black holes, and the time symmetric two black hole Misner data. Although the initial data sets represent different physical problems, the results for these systems are strikingly similar. At early times in the evolution, the apparent horizons may be very distorted and nonspherical (or disjoint in the case of two black holes, but the systems quickly settle down to a nearly spherical or oblate (in the case of rotating holes) configuration and the horizons are then seen to oscillate at the quasinormal frequency of the final black hole. In the case of two black holes with disjoint horizons, we see the appearance of a larger horizon surrounding both holes as they collide. From this point the horizon dynamics is very similar to the single distorted black hole systems. The wavelength and damping time of the quasinormal modes and the rotation parameter in the rotating cases can be read off directly from oscillations in the geometry of the black hole horizons. The apparent horizon is thus shown to be a powerful tool in the study of black hole spacetimes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The metric has a high degree of flexibility, which provides a great level of control over the formation of horizons.
“First, our metric has a high degree of flexibility, which provides us with a great level of control over the formation of horizons [3,4].”
From Exactly solvable 2D model for photon propagation in curved space: loss of interference and Bell inequality violation (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marzlin, K.-P., & Kinach, M. P. (2022) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac4fbb · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anninos, P., Bernstein, D., Brandt, S. R., Hobill, D., Seidel, E., & Smarr, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-09-15
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3801-3815
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143927221
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Centre for Supercomputing Applications
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- horizon dynamics, gravitational waves, rotating black holes, quasinormal modes, black hole collisions, black hole spacetimes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review