The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification
Open accessAbstract
The successful prediction of the weak mixing angle suggests that the effective theory beneath the grand unification scale is the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) with just two Higgs doublets. If we further assume that the unified gauge group contains SO(10), that the two light Higgs doublets lie mostly in a single irreducible SO(10) representation, and that the t, b, and \ensuremath{\tau} masses originate in renormalizable Yukawa interactions of the form 1${6}_{3}$scrO1${6}_{3}$, then also the top quark mass can be predicted in terms of the MSSM parameters. To compute ${\mathit{m}}_{\mathit{t}}$ we present a precise analytic approximation to the solution of the two-loop renormalization group equations, and study supersymmetric and GUT threshold corrections and the input value of the b quark mass. The large ratio of top to bottom quark masses derives from a large ratio, tan\ensuremath{\beta}, of Higgs vacuum expectation values. We point out that when tan\ensuremath{\beta} is large, so are certain corrections to the b quark mass prediction, unless a particular hierarchy exists in the parameters of the model. With such a hierarchy, which may result from approximate symmetries, the top mass prediction depends only weakly on the spectrum. Our results may be applied to any supersymmetric SO(10) model as long as ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{t}}$\ensuremath{\simeq}${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{b}}$\ensuremath{\simeq}${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\tau}}}$ at the GUT scale and there are no intermediate mass scales in the desert.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gasser, J., & Leutwyler, H. (1982) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(82)90035-7 · Cited by 1,753
Cited by
The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
Ellwanger, U., Hugonie, C., & Teixeira, A. M. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 · Cited by 992
CMS Physics Technical Design Report, Volume II: Physics Performance
Collaboration, T. C. (2007) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/6/s01 · Cited by 940
CP-conserving two-Higgs-doublet model: The approach to the decoupling limit
Gunion, J. F., & Haber, H. E. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.075019 · Cited by 890
DARK MATTER DETECTION IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
MUÑOZ, C. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04018154 · Cited by 299
Supersymmetric origin of matter
Balázs, C., Carena, M., Menon, A., Morrissey, D. E., & Wagner, C. E. M. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.075002 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, L. J., Rattazzi, R., & Sarid, U.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 7048-7065
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114958119
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.