The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Baryon asymmetry of the Universe in the standard model
Open accessAbstract
We study the interactions of quarks and antiquarks with the changing Higgs field during the electroweak phase transition, including quantum mechanical and some thermal effects, with the only source of CP violation being the known CKM phase. We show that the GIM cancellation, which has been commonly thought to imply a prediction which is at least 10 orders of magnitude too small, can be evaded in certain kinematic regimes, for instance, when the strange quark is totally reflected but the down quark is not. We report on a quantitative calculation of the asymmetry in a one-dimensional approximation based on the present understanding of the physics of the high-temperature environment, but with some aspects of the problem oversimplified. The resulting prediction for the magnitude and sign of the present baryonic asymmetry of the Universe agrees with the observed value, with moderately optimistic assumptions about the dynamics of the phase transition. Both magnitude and sign of the asymmetry have an intricate dependence on quark masses and mixings, so that quantitative agreement between prediction and observation would be highly nontrivial. At present uncertainties related to the dynamics of the EW phase transition and the oversimplifications of our treatment are too great to decide whether or not this is the correct explanation for the presence of remnant matter in our Universe; however, the present work makes it clear that the minimal standard model cannot be discounted as a contender for explaining this phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Symmetry Breaking through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies
't Hooft, G. (1976) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.8 · Cited by 3,362
On anomalous electroweak baryon-number non-conservation in the early universe
Kuzmin, V. A., Rubakov, V. A., & Shaposhnikov, M. E. (1985) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91028-7 · Cited by 3,008
Self-citationCohen, A. G., Kaplan, D. B., & Nelson, A. E. (1990) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90690-8 · Cited by 229
QUANTUM CORRECTIONS TO THE ELECTROWEAK SPHALERON TRANSITION
BAACKE, J., & JUNKER, S. (1993) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732393003251 · Cited by 17
Cited by
R-Parity-violating supersymmetry
Barbier, R., Bérat, C., Besançon, M., Chemtob, M., Deandrea, A., Dudas, E., Fayet, P., Lavignac, S., Moreau, G., Perez, E., et al. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.006 · Cited by 1,043
Morrissey, D. E., & Ramsey-Musolf, M. J. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/125003 · Cited by 852
Trodden, M. (1999) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.1463 · Cited by 521
Electroweak baryogenesis and standard model CP violation
Huet, P., & Sather, E. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.379 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrar, G. R., & Shaposhnikov, M. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-07-15
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 774-818
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975664118
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.