CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,736

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Some properties of the Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy

Iyer, Vivek, Wald, Robert M.·1994·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.50.846
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.50.846

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The entire gravitational entropy can be computed using the Iyer-Wald entropy functional, S_IW ≡ -2π ∫_H d^{D-2}x √q ∂L/∂R_{ijkl} ε_{ij} ε_{kl}.

    “Since the brane theory is in general a higher-derivative theory, in principle the entire gravitational entropy can be computed using the Iyer-Wald entropy functional [127,128],”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [128]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. V.P. Frolov, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 5383, 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.5383 · DOI
  2. T.A. Jacobson, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 3684, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3684 · DOI
  3. J.D. Brown, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 1407, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1407 · DOI · Paper page
  4. J.D. Brown, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 1420, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1420 · DOI
  5. R. M. Wald, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, R3427, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.R3427 · DOI · Paper page
  6. M. Visser, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 5697, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.5697 · DOI
  7. T.A. Jacobson, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 6587, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6587 · DOI · Paper page
  8. M. Ba nados, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 957, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.957 · DOI
  9. R. Penrose, 1960, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 10, 171, 10.1016/0003-4916(60)90021-X · DOI
  10. R. M. Wald, 1993, J. Math. Phys., 31, 2378, 10.1063/1.528839 · DOI
  11. WJ. Lee, 1990, J. Math. Phys., 31, 725, 10.1063/1.528801 · DOI · Paper page
  12. D. Bak, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 5173, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5173 · DOI
  13. D. Wiltshire, 1986, Phys. Lett., 169B, 36, 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90681-7 · DOI
  14. R. Beig, 1979, Phys. Lett., 69A, 153
  15. A. Ashtekar, 1979, J. Math. Phys., 20, 793, 10.1063/1.524151 · DOI
  16. B.S. Kay, 1991, Phys. Rep., 207, 49, 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-E · DOI · Paper page
  17. B.S. Kay, 1978, Commun. Math. Phys., 62, 55, 10.1007/BF01940330 · DOI
  18. R.D. Sorkin, 1991, Proc. R. Soc. London, A435, 635, 10.1098/rspa.1991.0166 · DOI
  19. S. Chandrasekhar, 1990, Proc. R. Soc. London, A428, 325, 10.1098/rspa.1990.0038 · DOI
  20. S. Chandrasekhar, 1991, Proc. R. Soc. London, A435, 645, 10.1098/rspa.1991.0167 · DOI
  21. G. Burnett, 1990, Proc. R. Soc. London, A430, 57, 10.1098/rspa.1990.0080 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Iyer, V., & Wald, R. M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1994-07-15
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
846-864
ISSN
0556-2821
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.50.846
Cited by
1,736
References
0
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review