Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. V. Black-hole absorption and tail corrections

Open access
Poisson, Eric, Sasaki, Misao·1995·Physical Review D

Abstract

A particle of mass \ensuremath{\mu} moves on a circular orbit of a nonrotating black hole of mass M. Under the restrictions \ensuremath{\mu}/M\ensuremath{\ll}1 and v\ensuremath{\ll}1, where v is the orbital veloity (in units in which c=1), we consider the gravitational waves emitted by such a binary system. The framework is that of black-hole perturbation theory. We calculate E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}, the rate at which the gravitational waves remove energy from the system. The total energy loss is given by E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}=E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}$+E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathit{H}}$, where E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}$ denotes that part of the gravitational-wave energy which is carried off to infinity, while E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathit{H}}$ denotes the part which is absorbed by the black hole. We show that the black-hole absorption is a small effect: E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathit{H}}$/E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}\ensuremath{\simeq}${\mathit{v}}^{8}$. This is explained by the presence of a potential barrier in the vicinity of the black hole: Most of the waves propagating initially toward the black hole are reflected off the barrier; the black hole is therefore unable to absorb much. The black-hole absorption, and indeed any other effect resulting from imposing ingoing-wave boundary conditions at the event horizon, are sufficiently small to be irrelevant to the construction of matched filters for gravitational-wave measurements. To derive this result we extend the techniques previously developed by Poisson and Sasaki for integrating the Regge-Wheeler equation. The extension consists of an explicit consideration of the horizon boundary conditions, which were largely ignored in the previous work. Finally, we compare the wave generation formalism which derives from perturbation theory to the post-Newtonian formalism of Blanchet and Damour. Among other things we consider the corrections to the asymptotic gravitational-wave field which are due to wave-propagation (tail) effects. The results obtained using perturbation theory are identical to that of post-Newtonian theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.51.5753

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Poisson, E., & Sasaki, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1995-05-15
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
5753-5767
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992634819
Cited by
208
References
0
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. V. Black-hole absorption and tail corrections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.51.5753
The paper
Poisson, E., & Sasaki, M. (1995). Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. V. Black-hole absorption and tail corrections. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.51.5753

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.