The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. V. Black-hole absorption and tail corrections
Open accessAbstract
A particle of mass \ensuremath{\mu} moves on a circular orbit of a nonrotating black hole of mass M. Under the restrictions \ensuremath{\mu}/M\ensuremath{\ll}1 and v\ensuremath{\ll}1, where v is the orbital veloity (in units in which c=1), we consider the gravitational waves emitted by such a binary system. The framework is that of black-hole perturbation theory. We calculate E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}, the rate at which the gravitational waves remove energy from the system. The total energy loss is given by E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}=E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}$+E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathit{H}}$, where E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}$ denotes that part of the gravitational-wave energy which is carried off to infinity, while E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathit{H}}$ denotes the part which is absorbed by the black hole. We show that the black-hole absorption is a small effect: E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{} $^{\mathit{H}}$/E\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}\ensuremath{\simeq}${\mathit{v}}^{8}$. This is explained by the presence of a potential barrier in the vicinity of the black hole: Most of the waves propagating initially toward the black hole are reflected off the barrier; the black hole is therefore unable to absorb much. The black-hole absorption, and indeed any other effect resulting from imposing ingoing-wave boundary conditions at the event horizon, are sufficiently small to be irrelevant to the construction of matched filters for gravitational-wave measurements. To derive this result we extend the techniques previously developed by Poisson and Sasaki for integrating the Regge-Wheeler equation. The extension consists of an explicit consideration of the horizon boundary conditions, which were largely ignored in the previous work. Finally, we compare the wave generation formalism which derives from perturbation theory to the post-Newtonian formalism of Blanchet and Damour. Among other things we consider the corrections to the asymptotic gravitational-wave field which are due to wave-propagation (tail) effects. The results obtained using perturbation theory are identical to that of post-Newtonian theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Echoes from the abyss: Tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons
Abedi, J., Dykaar, H., & Afshordi, N. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.082004 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Poisson, E., & Sasaki, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-05-15
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5753-5767
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992634819
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. V. Black-hole absorption and tail corrections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.51.5753
- The paper
- Poisson, E., & Sasaki, M. (1995). Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. V. Black-hole absorption and tail corrections. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.51.5753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.