Cited by 272Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesStatistical Mechanics and Entropy

Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole

Open access
Carlip, S.·1995·Physical Review D

Abstract

The presence of a horizon breaks the gauge invariance of (2+1)-dimensional general relativity, leading to the appearance of new physical states at the horizon. I show that the entropy of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole can be obtained as the logarithm of the number of these microscopic states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.51.632

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For 2+1 black hole solutions, dynamics at either the horizon or the boundary at infinity can lead to local degrees of freedom.

    “For such solutions, dynamics at either the horizon or the boundary at infinity can lead to local degrees of freedom [78, 247, 59, 96, 51, 24, 91]”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Introduction (p. 2) says that a boundary can make would-be gauge degrees of freedom dynamical, and applies this mechanism to the black-hole horizon. The Boundary Action (p. 5) describes dynamical fields at that horizon. Our copy does not establish the other location named in the claim—a boundary at infinity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3][3] M. Maggiore, Phys. Lett. B333 (1994) 39; 'Horizon quantization and thermodynamics of the 2+1 black hole,' Pisa preprint IFUP-TH 43/94 (1994). -
  2. [9][9] S. Carlip and C. Teitelboim, 'Aspects of black hole quantum mechanics and thermodynamics in 2+1 dimensions,' Institute for Advanced Study preprint IASSNS-HEP-94/34 and Davis preprint UCD-94-13 (1994). -
  3. [14][14] S. F¨ orste, 'A truly marginal deformation of SL(2 , I R) in a null direction,' Hebrew University preprint RI-8-94 (1994). -
  4. [18][18] For a nice derivation, see M. Ba˜ nados, 'Sugawara construction and the relation between diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations in Chern-Simons theory,' Imperial College preprint Imperial/TP/93-94/40 (1994). -
  5. [23][23] S. Ramgoolam, 'New modular Hopf algebras related to rational k ̂ sl (2),' Yale preprint YCTP-P2-93 (1993). -
  6. [25][25] S. Ramanujan and G. H. Hardy, Proc. London Math. Soc. (ser. 2) 17 (1918) 75, reprinted in Collected Papers of Srinivase Ramanujan , G. H. Hardy et al., editors (Chelsea Publishing Company, NY, 1962). -
  7. [27][27] V. G. Kaˇ c and M. Wakimoto, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1988) 4656. -
  8. [29][29] V. Chari and A. Pressley, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 102 (1987) 259. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlip, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Carlip, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1995-01-15
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
632-637
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000610068
Cited by
272
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy (FG0391ER40674)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
Keywords
(2+1)-dimensional black holes, black hole entropy, statistical mechanics of black holes, gauge invariance breaking, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review