Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing gravity to second post-Newtonian order: A field-theory approach

Open access
Damour, Thibault, Esposito-Farèse, Gilles·1996·Physical Review D

Abstract

A field-theory-based framework for discussing and interpreting experimental tests of relativistic gravity, notably at the second post-Newtonian (2PN) level, is introduced. Contrary to previous frameworks which attempted at parametrizing any conceivable phenomenological deviation from general relativity, we focus on the most general class of gravity models of the type suggested by unified theories: namely, models in which gravity is mediated by a tensor field together with one or several scalar fields. The 2PN approximation of these "tensor-multiscalar" theories is obtained thanks to a diagrammatic expansion which allows us to compute the Lagrangian describing the motion of $N$ bodies. In contrast with previous studies which had to introduce many phenomenological parameters, we find that, within this tensor-multiscalar framework, the 2PN deviations from general relativity can be fully described by introducing only two new 2PN parameters $\ensuremath{\varepsilon}$ and $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ beyond the usual (Eddington) 1PN parameters $\overline{\ensuremath{\beta}}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}1$ and $\overline{\ensuremath{\gamma}}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}1$. It follows from the basic tenets of field theory, notably the absence of negative-energy excitations, that $\overline{\ensuremath{\beta}}$, $\ensuremath{\varepsilon}$, and $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ (as well as all the further parameters entering higher post-Newtonian orders) must tend to zero with $\overline{\ensuremath{\gamma}}$. It is also found that $\ensuremath{\varepsilon}$ and $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ do not enter the 2PN equations of motion of light. Therefore, within our field-theory framework, second-order light-deflection or time-delay experiments cannot probe any 2PN deviation from general relativity. On the other hand, these experiments can give a clean access to $\overline{\ensuremath{\gamma}}$, which is of greatest significance as it measures the basic coupling strength of matter to the scalar fields. Because of the importance of self-gravity effects in neutron stars, binary-pulsar experiments are found to constitute a unique testing ground for the 2PN structure of relativistic gravity. A simplified analysis of current data on four binary-pulsar systems already leads to significant constraints on the two 2PN parameters $|\ensuremath{\varepsilon}|<7\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$, $|\ensuremath{\zeta}|<6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.53.5541

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farèse, G.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1996-05-15
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
5541-5578
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2118761939
Cited by
266
References
2
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing gravity to second post-Newtonian order: A field-theory approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.53.5541
The paper
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farèse, G. (1996). Testing gravity to second post-Newtonian order: A field-theory approach. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.53.5541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.