The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonequilibrium dynamics of symmetry breaking inλΦ4theory
Open accessAbstract
The time evolution of O$(N)$ symmetric $\ensuremath{\lambda}({\ensuremath{\Phi}}^{2}{)}^{2}$ scalar field theory is studied in the large $N$ limit. In this limit the $〈{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{i}〉$ mean field and two-point correlation function $〈{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{i}{\mathbf{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{j}〉$ evolve together as a self-consistent closed Hamiltonian system, characterized by a Gaussian density matrix. The static part of the effective Hamiltonian defines the true effective potential ${U}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ for configurations far from thermal equilibrium. Numerically solving the time evolution equations for energy densities corresponding to a quench in the unstable spinodal region, we find results quite different from what might be inferred from the equilibrium free energy potential $F$. Typical time evolutions show effectively irreversible energy flow from the coherent mean fields to the quantum fluctuating modes, due to the creation of massless Goldstone bosons near threshold. The plasma frequency and collisionless damping rate of the mean fields are calculated in terms of the particle number density by a linear response analysis and compared with the numerical results. Dephasing of the fluctuations leads also to the growth of an effective entropy and the transition from quantum to classical behavior of the ensemble. In addition to casting some light on fundamental issues of nonequilibrium quantum statistical mechanics, the general framework presented in this work may be applied to a study of the dynamics of second order phase transitions in a wide variety of Landau-Ginsburg systems described by a scalar order parameter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bender, C. M., & Cooper, F. (1983) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90383-8 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Cited by
Berges, J., Borsányi, S., & Wetterich, C. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.142002 · Cited by 482
Gravitational wave background from reheating after hybrid inflation
García-Bellido, J., Figueroa, D. G., & Sastre, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.043517 · Cited by 278
Scalar field dynamics in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetimes
Boyanovsky, D., Cormier, D., de Vega, H. J., Holman, R., Singh, A., & Srednicki, M. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.1939 · Cited by 117
Linear response, validity of semiclassical gravity, and the stability of flat space
Anderson, P. R., Molina-París, C., & Mottola, E. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.024026 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, F., Habib, S., Kluger, Y., & Mottola, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-05-15
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6471-6503
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W1807918378
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonequilibrium dynamics of symmetry breaking inλΦ4theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.55.6471
- The paper
- Cooper, F., Habib, S., Kluger, Y., & Mottola, E. (1997). Nonequilibrium dynamics of symmetry breaking inλΦ4theory. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.55.6471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.