Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring gravitational waves from binary black hole coalescences. I. Signal to noise for inspiral, merger, and ringdown

Open access
Flanagan, Éanna É., Hughes, Scott A.·1998·Physical Review D

Abstract

We estimate the expected signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from the three phases (inspiral, merger, and ringdown) of coalescing binary black holes (BBHs) for initial and advanced ground-based interferometers (LIGO-VIRGO) and for the space-based interferometer LISA. Ground-based interferometers can do moderate SNR (a few tens), moderate accuracy studies of BBH coalescences in the mass range of a few to about 2000 solar masses; LISA can do high SNR (of order ${10}^{4}$), high accuracy studies in the mass range of about ${10}^{5}--{10}^{8}$ solar masses. BBHs might well be the first sources detected by LIGO-VIRGO: they are visible to much larger distances---up to 500 Mpc by initial interferometers---than coalescing neutron star binaries (heretofore regarded as the ``bread and butter'' workhorse source for LIGO-VIRGO, visible to about 30 Mpc by initial interferometers). Low-mass BBHs (up to ${50M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ for initial LIGO interferometers, ${100M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ for advanced, ${10}^{6}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ for LISA) are best searched for via their well-understood inspiral waves; higher mass BBHs must be searched for via their poorly understood merger waves and/or their well-understood ringdown waves. A matched filtering search for massive BBHs based on ringdown waves should be capable of finding BBHs in the mass range of about ${100M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}--{700M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ out to $\ensuremath{\sim}200\mathrm{Mpc}$ for initial LIGO interferometers, and in the mass range of $\ensuremath{\sim}{200M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ to $\ensuremath{\sim}{3000M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ out to about $z=1$ for advanced interferometers. The required number of templates is of the order of 6000 or less. Searches based on merger waves could increase the number of detected massive BBHs by a factor of the order of 10 over those found from inspiral and ringdown waves, without detailed knowledge of the waveform shapes, using a noise monitoring search algorithm which we describe. A full set of merger templates from numerical relativity simulations could further increase the number of detected BBHs by an additional factor of up to $\ensuremath{\sim}4.$

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.57.4535

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Flanagan, É. É., & Hughes, S. A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1998-04-15
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
4535-4565
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2140973976
Cited by
611
References
1
FWCI
19.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.