Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Studies of nonlinear QED in collisions of 46.6 GeV electrons with intense laser pulses

Bamber, C., Boege, S. J., Koffas, T., Kotseroglou, T., Melissinos, A. C., Meyerhofer, D. D., Reis, D. A., Ragg, W., Bula, C., McDonald, K. T., Prebys, E. J., Burke, D. L., Field, R. C., Horton-Smith, G., Spencer, J. E., Walz, D., Berridge, S. C., Bugg, W. M., Shmakov, K., Weidemann, A. W.·1999·Physical Review D

Abstract

We report on measurements of quantum electrodynamic processes in an intense electromagnetic wave, where nonlinear effects (both multiphoton and vacuum polarization) are prominent. Nonlinear Compton scattering and electron-positron pair production have been observed in collisions of 46.6 GeV and 49.1 GeV electrons of the Final Focus Test Beam at SLAC with terawatt pulses of 1053 nm and 527 nm wavelengths from a Nd:glass laser. Peak laser intensities of $\ensuremath{\approx}0.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{18}{\mathrm{W}/\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ have been achieved, corresponding to a value of $\ensuremath{\approx}0.4$ for the parameter $\ensuremath{\eta}{=eE}_{\mathrm{rms}}/m{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}c$ and to a value of $\ensuremath{\approx}0.25$ for the parameter ${\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}_{e}{=E}_{\mathrm{rms}}^{\ensuremath{\star}}{/E}_{\mathrm{crit}}{=eE}_{\mathrm{rms}}^{\ensuremath{\star}}\ensuremath{\Elzxh}{/m}^{2}{c}^{3},$ where ${E}_{\mathrm{rms}}^{\ensuremath{\star}}$ is the rms electric field strength of the laser in the electron rest frame. We present data on the scattered electron spectra arising from nonlinear Compton scattering with up to four photons absorbed from the field. A convolved spectrum of the forward high energy photons is also given. The observed positron production rate depends on the fifth power of the laser intensity, as expected for a process where five photons are absorbed from the field. The positrons are interpreted as arising from the collision of a high-energy Compton scattered photon with the laser beam. The results are found to be in agreement with theoretical predictions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.60.092004

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Metadata

Authors
Bamber, C., Boege, S. J., Koffas, T., Kotseroglou, T., Melissinos, A. C., Meyerhofer, D. D., Reis, D. A., Ragg, W., Bula, C., McDonald, K. T., Prebys, E. J., Burke, D. L., Field, R. C., Horton-Smith, G., Spencer, J. E., Walz, D., Berridge, S. C., Bugg, W. M., Shmakov, K., & Weidemann, A. W.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1999-10-08
Volume
60
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2087608726
Cited by
470
References
24
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies of nonlinear QED in collisions of 46.6 GeV electrons with intense laser pulses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.60.092004
The paper
Bamber, C., Boege, S. J., Koffas, T., Kotseroglou, T., Melissinos, A. C., Meyerhofer, D. D., Reis, D. A., Ragg, W., Bula, C., McDonald, K. T., Prebys, E. J., Burke, D. L., Field, R. C., Horton-Smith, G., Spencer, J. E., Walz, D., Berridge, S. C., Bugg, W. M., Shmakov, K., & Weidemann, A. W. (1999). Studies of nonlinear QED in collisions of 46.6 GeV electrons with intense laser pulses. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.60.092004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.