Cited by 703Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface terms as counterterms in the AdS-CFT correspondence

Open access

Abstract

We examine the recently proposed technique of adding boundary counterterms to the gravitational action for spacetimes which are locally asymptotic to anti--de Sitter spacetimes. In particular, we explicitly identify higher order counterterms, which allow us to consider spacetimes of dimensions $d<~7.$ As the counterterms eliminate the need of ``background subtraction'' in calculating the action, we apply this technique to study examples where the appropriate background was ambiguous or unknown: topological black holes, Taub-NUT-AdS and Taub-Bolt-AdS. We also identify certain cases where the covariant counterterms fail to render the action finite, and we comment on the dual field theory interpretation of this result. In some examples, the case of a vanishing cosmological constant may be recovered in a limit, which allows us to check results and resolve ambiguities in certain asymptotically flat spacetime computations in the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.60.104001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 700

Metadata

Authors
Emparan, R., Johnson, C. V., & Myers, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
60
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2137060839
Cited by
703
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 32
FWCI
21.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9733173)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
AdS/CFT correspondence, counterterms, boundary counterterms, asymptotically AdS spacetimes, topological black holes, background subtraction, finite action, vanishing cosmological constant, asymptotically flat spacetimes, holography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review