Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bounds on universal extra dimensions

Open access
Appelquist, Thomas, Cheng, Hsin-Chia, Dobrescu, Bogdan A.·2001·Physical Review D

Abstract

We show that the bound from the electroweak data on the size of extra dimensions accessible to all the standard model fields is rather loose. These ``universal'' extra dimensions could have a compactification scale as low as 300 GeV for one extra dimension. This is because the Kaluza-Klein number is conserved and thus the contributions to the electroweak observables arise only from loops. The main constraint comes from weak-isospin violation effects. We also compute the contributions to the S parameter and the $\mathrm{Zb}\overline{b}$ vertex. The direct bound on the compactification scale is set by CDF and D0 in the few hundred GeV range, and run II of the Tevatron will either discover extra dimensions or else it could significantly raise the bound on the compactification scale. In the case of two universal extra dimensions, the current lower bound on the compactification scale depends logarithmically on the ultraviolet cutoff of the higher dimensional theory, but can be estimated to lie between 400 and 800 GeV. With three or more extra dimensions, the cutoff dependence may be too strong to allow an estimate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.64.035002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,200

Metadata

Authors
Appelquist, T., Cheng, H.-C., & Dobrescu, B. A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2001-06-21
Volume
64
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2101450001
Cited by
1,200
References
0
FWCI
25.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bounds on universal extra dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.64.035002
The paper
Appelquist, T., Cheng, H.-C., & Dobrescu, B. A. (2001). Bounds on universal extra dimensions. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.64.035002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.