The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CP-violating phases in supersymmetry, electric dipole moments, and linear colliders
Open accessAbstract
We reexamine large CP-violating phases in the general minimal supersymmetric standard model, as well as more restricted models. We perform a detailed scan over parameter space to find solutions which satisfy the current experimental limits on the electric dipole moments of the electron, neutron and ${}^{199}\mathrm{Hg}$ atom, exploring the allowed configurations of phases and masses, and we attempt to quantify the level of tuning of the parameters necessary to populate the regions of cancellations. We then consider the measurement of CP-violating phases at a future linear collider. We find that measurements of chargino and neutralino masses and production cross sections allow for a determination of ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}$ (the phase of ${M}_{1})$ to a precision of $\ensuremath{\pi}/30,$ while the EDM constraints require that ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ be too small to be measured. Using the EDM constraints we find that the CP-even model parameters and the phase ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}$ can be determined at a linear collider with $400\mathrm{GeV}$ c.m. energy. As long as some information on the size of $|\ensuremath{\mu}|$ is included in the observables, a measurement of ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}$ is guaranteed for ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}>\ensuremath{\pi}/10.$ To unambiguously identify $\mathrm{CP}$ violation, we construct CP-odd kinematical variables at a linear collider. However, the $\mathrm{CP}$ asymmetries are rather small, typically about 0.1--1.5 %, and it will be challenging to experimentally observe the predicted asymmetries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physics interplay of the LHC and the ILC
Weiglein, G., Barklow, T., Boos, E., De Roeck, A., Desch, K., Gianotti, F., Godbole, R., Gunion, J. F., Haber, H. E., Heinemeyer, S., et al. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.003 · Cited by 405
Self-citationPolarized positrons and electrons at the linear collider
Moortgat-Pick, G., Abe, T., Alexander, G., Ananthanarayan, B., Babich, A. A., Bharadwaj, V., Barber, D., Bartl, A., Brachmann, A., Chen, S., et al. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.003 · Cited by 294
Supersymmetric origin of matter
Balázs, C., Carena, M., Menon, A., Morrissey, D. E., & Wagner, C. E. M. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.075002 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Barger, V., Falk, T., Han, T., Jiang, J., Li, T., & Plehn, T.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-07-31
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2120044116
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CP-violating phases in supersymmetry, electric dipole moments, and linear colliders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.64.056007
- The paper
- Barger, V., Falk, T., Han, T., Jiang, J., Li, T., & Plehn, T. (2001). CP-violating phases in supersymmetry, electric dipole moments, and linear colliders. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.64.056007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.