The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings
Open accessAbstract
The strong beams of high-frequency gravitational waves (GW's) emitted by cusps and kinks of cosmic strings are studied in detail. As a consequence of these beams, the stochastic ensemble of GW's generated by a cosmological network of oscillating loops is strongly non-Gaussian, and includes occasional sharp bursts that stand above the ``confusion'' GW noise made of many smaller overlapping bursts. Even if only 10% of all string loops have cusps these bursts might be detectable by the planned GW detectors Laser Interferometric Gravitation Observatory (LIGO)-VIRGO and Laser Interference Space Antenna (LISA) for string tensions as small as $G\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}.$ In the implausible case where the average cusp number per loop oscillation is extremely small, the smaller bursts emitted by the ubiquitous kinks will be detectable by LISA for string tensions as small as $G\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}.$ We show that the strongly non-Gaussian nature of the stochastic GW's generated by strings modifies the usual derivation of constraints on $G\ensuremath{\mu}$ from pulsar timing experiments. In particular the usually considered ``rms GW background'' is, when $G\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}7},$ an overestimate of the more relevant confusion GW noise because it includes rare, intense bursts. The consideration of the confusion GW noise suggests that a grand unified theory value $G\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$ is compatible with existing pulsar data, and that a modest improvement in pulsar timing accuracy could detect the confusion noise coming from a network of cuspy string loops down to $G\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}.$ The GW bursts discussed here might be accompanied by gamma ray bursts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity waves and string inflation
Silverstein, E., & Westphal, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.106003 · Cited by 724
String Theory, Gravity and Experiment
Damour, T., & Lilley, M. (2008) · Les Houches · doi:10.1016/s0924-8099(08)80027-3 · Cited by 35
Self-citationEarly science acceleration experiments with GPT-5
Bubeck, S., Coester, C., Eldan, R., Gowers, T., Lee, Y. T., Lupsasca, A., Sawhney, M., Scherrer, R., Sellke, M., Spears, B. K., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16072 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Damour, T., & Vilenkin, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-08-24
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 78202
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2058762993
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.64.064008
- The paper
- Damour, T., & Vilenkin, A. (2001). Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.64.064008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.