Cited by 230Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Cosmology with negative potentials

Open access
Felder, Gary, Frolov, Andrei, Kofman, Lev, Linde, Andrei·2002·Physical Review D

Abstract

We investigate cosmological evolution in models where the effective potential $V(\ensuremath{\varphi})$ may become negative for some values of the field $\ensuremath{\varphi}.$ Phase portraits of such theories in the space of variables $(\ensuremath{\varphi},\stackrel{\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}}{\ensuremath{\varphi}},H)$ have several qualitatively new features as compared with phase portraits in the theories with $V(\ensuremath{\varphi})>0.$ Cosmological evolution in models with potentials with a ``stable'' minimum at $V(\ensuremath{\varphi})<0$ is similar in some respects to the evolution in models with potentials unbounded from below. Instead of reaching an AdS regime dominated by the negative vacuum energy, the universe reaches a turning point where its energy density vanishes, and then it contracts to a singularity with properties that are practically independent of $V(\ensuremath{\varphi}).$ We apply our methods to investigation of the recently proposed cyclic universe scenario. We show that in addition to the singularity problem there are other problems that need to be resolved in order to realize a cyclic regime in this scenario. We propose several modifications of this scenario and conclude that the best way to improve it is to add a usual stage of inflation after the singularity and use that inflationary stage to generate perturbations in the standard way.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.66.023507

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felder, G., Frolov, A., Kofman, L., & Linde, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-07-02
Volume
66
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2008054089
Cited by
230
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
negative potential, scalar field cosmology, phase portraits, singularities, cyclic universe, cosmological perturbations, effective potential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review