Cited by 42Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Hilbert space structure of covariant loop quantum gravity

Open access
Alexandrov, Sergei·2002·Physical Review D

Abstract

We investigate Hilbert space in the Lorentz covariant approach to loop quantum gravity. We restrict ourselves to the space where all area operators are simultaneously diagonalizable, assuming that it exists. In this sector, quantum states are realized by a generalization of spin network states based on Lorentz Wilson lines projected on irreducible representations of an SO(3) subgroup. The problem of infinite dimensionality of the unitary Lorentz representations is absent due to this projection. Nevertheless, the projection preserves the Lorentz covariance of the Wilson lines so that the symmetry is not broken. Under certain conditions, the states can be thought of as functions on a homogeneous space. We define the inner product as an integral over this space. With respect to this inner product, the spin networks form an orthonormal basis in the investigated sector. We argue that it is the only relevant part of a larger state space arising in the approach. The problem of the noncommutativity of the Lorentz connection is solved by restriction to the simple representations. The resulting structure shows similarities with the spin foam approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.66.024028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 42

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [2][2] G. Immirzi, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 57 , 65 (1997) [gr-qc/9701052]. - · arXiv
  2. [3][3] C. Rovelli and T. Thiemann, Phys. Rev. D 57 , 1009 (1998) [gr-qc/9705059]. - · arXiv
  3. [5][5] S. Alexandrov, Phys. Rev. D 65 , 024011 (2002) [gr-qc/0107071]. - · arXiv
  4. [6][6] J. Samuel, Class. Quantum Grav. 17 , L141 (2000) [gr-qc/0005095]; Phys. Rev. D 63 , 068501 (2001). - · arXiv
  5. [7][7] S. Alexandrov, Class. Quantum Grav. 17 , 4255 (2000) [gr-qc/0005085]. - · arXiv
  6. [8][8] S. Alexandrov and D. Vassilevich, Phys. Rev. D 64 , 044023 (2001) [gr-qc/0103105]. - · arXiv
  7. [9][9] C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Nucl. Phys. B442 , 593 (1995); J. Lewandowski, The operators of quantum gravity lecture at the workshop on canonical and quantum gravity (Warsaw, 1995); S. Frittelli, L. Lehner, and C. Rovelli, Class Quantum Grav. 13 , 2921 (1996). -
  8. [10][10] A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Class. Quantum Grav. 14 , A55 (1997) [gr-qc/9602046]. - · arXiv
  9. [11][11] A. Perez and C. Rovelli, Phys. Rev. D 63 , 041501 (2001) [gr-qc/0009021]; Phys. Rev. D 64 , 064002 (2001) [gr-qc/0011037]. - · arXiv
  10. [13][13] A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Representation theory of analytic holonomy C ⋆ algebras in Knots and quantum gravity ed. J. Baez (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994); J. Geom. Phys. 17 , 191 (1995); J. Math. Phys. 36 , 2170 (1995). -
  11. [15][15] S. Yu. Alexandrov and D. V. Vassilevich, Phys. Rev. D 58 , 124029 (1998) [gr-qc/9806001]. - · arXiv
  12. [19][19] D. Oriti, Rept. Prog. Phys. 64 , 1489 (2001) [gr-qc/0106091]. - · arXiv
  13. [20][20] J. W. Barrett and L. Crane, Class. Quantum Grav. 17 , 3101 (2000) [gr-qc/9904025]. - · arXiv
  14. [21][21] R. E. Livine and D. Oriti, Barrett-Crane spin foam model from generalized BF type action for gravity, gr-qc/0104043. - · arXiv
  15. [23][23] T. Thiemann, Class. Qauntum Grav. 15 , 839 (1998) [gr-qc/9606089]; Class. Qauntum Grav. 15 , 875 (1998) [gr-qc/9606090]. - · arXiv
  16. [24][24] I. M. Gel'fand, R. A. Minlos and Z. Ya. Shapiro, Representations of the rotation and Lorentz groups and their applications (Pergamon Press, 1963), pages 187-189.

Authors
Alexandrov, S.
Affiliations
École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
Corresponding author
Alexandrov, Sergei
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-07-22
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
024028
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2134752045
Cited by
42
References
36
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
loop quantum gravity, Lorentz covariance, Hilbert space structure, spin network states, Wilson lines, irreducible representations, homogeneous spaces, orthonormal bases, area operator, spin foams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review