Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 68Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 3 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Radion stabilization in compact hyperbolic extra dimensions

Open access
Nasri, Salah, Silva, Pedro J., Starkman, Glenn D., Trodden, Mark·2002·Physical Review D

Abstract

We consider radion stabilization in hyperbolic brane-world scenarios. We demonstrate that in the context of Einstein gravity, matter fields which stabilize the extra dimensions must violate the null energy condition. This result is shown to hold even allowing for Friedmann-Robertson-Walker-like expansion on the brane. In particular, we explicitly demonstrate how one putative source of stabilizing matter fails to work, and how others violate the above condition. We speculate on a number of ways in which we may bypass this result, including the effect of Casimir energy in these spaces. A brief discussion of supersymmetry in these backgrounds is also given.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

In compact hyperbolic extra-dimensional brane-world models, stabilizing the radion while allowing an acceptable FRW cosmology requires bulk matter that violates the null energy condition. The authors demonstrate this in Einstein gravity, give a d-form example that fails the condition, and suggest quantum Casimir effects as a possible loophole.

Key findings

  • Any bulk matter stabilizing the compact hyperbolic radion and yielding acceptable brane cosmology must violate the null energy condition; this holds even allowing FRW expansion on the brane.
  • For a Minkowski brane and pure CHM, the required stress tensor gives \(T_{AB}N^A N^B = - (d-1)(d+2)M^{2+d}/(4R_h^2) < 0\) for a null vector along the hyperboloid.
  • A specific stabilizing candidate—a cosmological constant plus a d-form flux—also violates the null energy condition, with \(T_{AB}N^A N^B = - (d-1)(d-2)\beta^2/8\, g_{ii}N_iN_i < 0\).
  • Casimir energy may help: \(\rho_C \propto R_h^{-p}\) with \(p>0\), and if \(\rho_C<0\), the sign of energy density and pressure is “precisely right” to help stabilize \(H^3/\Gamma\); a numerical study of a minimally coupled scalar on the Thurston manifold found negative Casimir energy density.
  • Supersymmetry in hyperbolic backgrounds is generally broken: for even \(d\), all supersymmetries are broken; for odd \(d\), survival depends on \(\Gamma\), and in the special case \(d=3\) no supersymmetries remain.

Methods

  • The authors analyze Einstein gravity in \(4+d+n\) dimensions with a factorizable bulk \(\Sigma^{4+d+n}=F^{3+1}\times H^d/\Gamma\times S^n\), where \(H^d/\Gamma\) is a compact hyperbolic manifold and \(S^n\) is an n-sphere.
  • They derive both an effective 3+1-dimensional theory with radion fields \(\phi,\psi\) and the full higher-dimensional Einstein equations, using a perfect-fluid ansatz for bulk matter and imposing the null energy condition.
  • They illustrate the general result with a d-form flux plus cosmological constant example, then discuss Casimir energy and supersymmetry in compact hyperbolic backgrounds.

Limitations

  • The paper states that understanding Casimir energy in the specific highly topologically complex manifolds useful for brane-world models is “extremely useful, but seems calculationally formidable and is beyond the scope of this paper.”
  • The authors do not present generic results for \(\rho_C\) in specific CHMs; they only note a numerical study of a minimally coupled scalar on the Thurston manifold.
  • The results apply to extra dimensions large enough that general relativity is a valid theory; the paper notes that the assumption of complete GR validity may break down, and that simple Casimir estimates are not a substitute for detailed calculation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.66.045029

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 3 Not checked · 23 Own results and interpretations

15 more claims

Create a free account to see all 26 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 6
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Nasri, S., Silva, P. J., Starkman, G. D., & Trodden, M.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2002-08-28
Volume
66
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2024323291
Cited by
68
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0098747, 0094122)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Syracuse University
  • Aspen Center for Physics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
radion stabilization, compactified extra dimensions, null energy condition violation, general relativity, Casimir energy, supersymmetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.