The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background using the likelihood function
Open accessAbstract
Future experiments will produce high-resolution temperature maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and are expected to reveal the signature of gravitational lensing by intervening large-scale structures. We construct all-sky maximum-likelihood estimators that use the lensing effect to estimate the projected density (convergence) of these structures, its power spectrum, and cross-correlation with other observables. This contrasts with earlier quadratic-estimator approaches that Taylor expanded the observed CMB temperature to linear order in the lensing deflection angle; these approaches gave estimators for the temperature-convergence correlation in terms of the CMB three-point correlation function and for the convergence power spectrum in terms of the CMB four-point correlation function, which can be biased and nonoptimal due to terms beyond the linear order. We show that for sufficiently weak lensing, the maximum-likelihood estimator reduces to the computationally less demanding quadratic estimator. The maximum likelihood and quadratic approaches are compared by evaluating the root-mean-square (rms) error and bias in the reconstructed convergence map in a numerical simulation; it is found that both the rms errors and bias are of order 1 percent for the case of Planck and of order 10--20 percent for a 1 arcminute beam experiment. We conclude that for recovering lensing information from temperature data acquired by these experiments, the quadratic estimator is close to optimal, but further work will be required to determine whether this is also the case for lensing of the CMB polarization field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background
Sachs, R. K., & Wolfe, A. M. (1967) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/148982 · Cited by 1,815
Cited by
Planck 2018 results: I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 · Cited by 1,635
Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.063526 · Cited by 586
Self-citationCosmic microwave background lensing reconstruction on the full sky
Okamoto, T., & Hu, W. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.083002 · Cited by 472
Planck 2013 results. XVII. Gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Armitage-Caplan, C., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Atrio-Barandela, F., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321543 · Cited by 391
Cosmology with weak lensing surveys
MUNSHI, D., VALAGEAS, P., VANWAERBEKE, L., & HEAVENS, A. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.02.003 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-02-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2106238303
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background using the likelihood function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.67.043001
- The paper
- Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2003). Analyzing weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background using the likelihood function. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.67.043001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.