Cited by 142Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Effective gravitational equations on a brane world with induced gravity

Open access
Maeda, Kei-ichi, Mizuno, Shuntaro, Torii, Takashi·2003·Physical Review D

Abstract

We present the effective equations to describe the four-dimensional gravity of a brane world, assuming that a five-dimensional bulk spacetime satisfies the Einstein equations and gravity is confined on the ${Z}_{2}$ symmetric brane. Applying this formalism, we study the induced-gravity brane model first proposed by Dvali, Gabadadze, and Porrati. In a generalization of their model, we show that an effective cosmological constant on the brane can be extremely reduced in contrast with the case of the Randall-Sundrum model even if a bulk cosmological constant and a brane tension are not fine tuned.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.68.024033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the presence of adiabatic perturbations, independent Hubble patches differ only in their local value of comoving spatial curvature K.

    “In the presence of adiabatic perturbations, which are currently consistent with all cosmological observations (e.g.[1,20]), these independent Hubble patches would only differ in their local value of comoving spatial curvature K.”

    From Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang (2014) · cites this paper as [20]

    The FRW-universe and effective Friedmann-equations sections discuss homogeneous cosmology and a curvature term, but do not address independent Hubble patches or adiabatic perturbations. Searches for those concepts and for observational consistency found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Planck (+WMAP) observations show that ζ has a near-scale-invariant spectrum with amplitude (2.196 ± 0.059) × 10^-9 and tilt -0.0397 ± 0.0073 at k = 0.05 Mpc^-1.

    “Planck (+WMAP) observations [20] show that ζ has a near-scale-invariant spectrum of perturbations:”

    From Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang (2014) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Because the holographic fluid is subdominant for most of cosmic evolution, standard cosmological perturbation theory is applicable.

    “As the holographic fluid is sub-dominant for most of the cosmic evolution, one expects the standard cosmological perturbation theory, that has been extremely successful in explaining cosmic microwave background observations (e.g.[1,20], amongst other observational probes), to be applicable.”

    From Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang (2014) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4724 (1995).
  2. For earlier work on this topic, see K. Akama, Lect. Notes Phys. 176, 267 (1982) [hep- th/0001113];
  3. M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 159,22(1985);
  4. M. Gogberashvili, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 2025(1999); hep-ph/9908347. · arXiv
  5. I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998);
  6. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999); ibid, 83, 4690 (1999).
  7. T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000).
  8. M. Sasaki, T. Shiromizu and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024008 (2000).
  9. K. Maeda and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124009 (2000).
  10. K. Maeda, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 148, 59 (2003) .
  11. G. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065007 (2001);
  12. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Shifman, hep-th/0202174. · arXiv
  13. A. Lue, Phys. Rev. D 59, 103503 (1999);
  14. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, M. Kolanović, and F. Nitti, Phys. Rev. D 64, 084004 (2001);
  15. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Shifman, hep-th/0202174; G. Kofinas, J. High Energy Phys. 08, 034 (2001). · arXiv
  16. C. Deffayet, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103504 (2002).
  17. C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044026 (2002).
  18. G. Kofinas, E. Papantonopoulous, and I. Pappa, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104014 (2002);
  19. G. Kofinas, E. Pa- pantonopoulous, and V. Zamarias, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104028 (2002).
  20. S. L. Dubovsky and V. A. Rubakov, hep-th/0212222, · arXiv
  21. C. Deffayet, Phys. Lett. B 502, 199 (2001).
  22. C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044023 (2002);
  23. C. Deffayet, S. J. Landau, J. Raux, M. Zaldarriaga, and P. Astier, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024019 (2002).
  24. H. Collins, B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024019 (2002);
  25. Y. V. Shtanov, hep-th/0005193; · arXiv
  26. N. J. Kim, H. W. Lee, and Y. S. Myung, Phys. Lett. B 504, 323 (2001).
  27. V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov, astro-ph/0202346. · arXiv
  28. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752 (1977).
  29. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064006 (2000);
  30. S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 484, 119 (2000).
  31. S. W. Hawking, T. Hertog, and H.S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043501 (2001); ibid. 63, 083504 (2001);
  32. S. W. Hawking and T. Hertog, Phys. Rev. D 66, 123509 (2002).
  33. T. Tanaka, gr-qc/0305031. · arXiv
  34. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maeda, K.-I., Mizuno, S., & Torii, T.
Affiliations
Waseda University (JP)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2003-07-30
Volume
68
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2150459126
Cited by
142
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Waseda University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
braneworld, induced gravity, DGP model, Randall-Sundrum model, cosmological constant, brane tension, bulk cosmological constant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review