The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Redshifting rings of power
Open accessAbstract
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) has provided a precise template for features in the linear power spectrum: the matter-radiation turnover, sound horizon drop, and acoustic oscillations. In a two-dimensional power spectrum in redshift and angular space, the features appear as distorted rings, and yield simultaneous, purely geometric, measures of the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ and angular diameter distance ${D}_{A}(z)$ via an absolute version of the Alcock-Paczynski test. Employing a simple Fisher matrix tool, we explore how future surveys can exploit these rings of power for dark energy studies. High-z CMB determinations of H and ${D}_{A}$ are best complemented at moderate to low redshift $(z\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.5)$ with a population of objects that are at least as abundant as clusters of galaxies. We find that a sample similar to that of the ongoing SDSS luminous red galaxy survey can achieve statistical errors at the $\ensuremath{\sim}5%$ level for ${D}_{A}(z)$ and $H(z)$ in several redshift bins. This, in turn, implies errors of $\ensuremath{\sigma}(w)=0.03--0.05$ for a constant dark energy equation of state in a flat universe. Deep galaxy cluster surveys such as the planned South Pole Telescope survey can extend this test out to $z\ensuremath{\sim}1$ or as far as redshift follow-up is available. We find that the expected constraints are at the $\ensuremath{\sigma}(w)=0.04--0.08$ level, comparable to those of galaxies and complementary in redshift coverage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
“24; Eisenstein, Hu & Tegmark 1998; Cooray et al. 2001; Blake & Glazebrook 2003; Hu & Haiman 2003; Linder 2003; Seo & Eisenstein 2003).”
BackgroundPadmanabhan, N., Xu, X., Eisenstein, D. J., Scalzo, R., Cuesta, A. J., Mehta, K. T., & Kazin, E. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21888.x · Cited by 687
Extragalactic science, cosmology, and Galactic archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph
Takada, M., Ellis, R. S., Chiba, M., Greene, J. E., Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Bundy, K., Cohen, J., Doré, O., Graves, G., et al. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/pst019 · Cited by 685
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: survey design and first data release
Drinkwater, M. J., Jurek, R. J., Blake, C., Woods, D., Pimbblet, K. A., Glazebrook, K., Sharp, R., Pracy, M. B., Brough, S., Colless, M., et al. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15754.x · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, W., & Haiman, Z.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-09-29
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2118386282
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redshifting rings of power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.68.063004
- The paper
- Hu, W., & Haiman, Z. (2003). Redshifting rings of power. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.68.063004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.